GFO Reactor Tuning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jdzzl03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Jdzzl03

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
53
Reaction score
77
Location
Charlotte
What state or country do you live in
North Carolina
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey everyone! I plan on using an Avast Spyglass reactor to run GFO for Phosphate control. The last time I used GFO (In a filter sock) it worked so well that my nutrients bottomed out and I ended up battling dinos for a month. So my question is: Is it better to use less media with the reactor and the pump running full blast or is it better to fill the reactor with media and use less flow? Just curious about your experience and how you found the sweet spot. For reference I have a heavily stocked tank (wrasses, tangs and anthias) so I like to feed constantly and keep everyone happy. Thanks!
 
I have a 200-gallon system. I fill my Nyos Torq body 1.0 half with Phosi-Ex (GFO) and half with carbon. Then I set it to run full. My system is heavily-stocked as well with 33 fish.
Thats what I was leaning towards. I plan on running a separate reactor for carbon as well. Given that the pumps are so small I figured people were running less media as opposed to undersized pumps but wanted to check. Thanks!
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT DO YOU MOST OFTEN NOTICE IN YOUR REEF AFTER LIGHTS OUT?

  • Fish settling into their sleeping spots

    Votes: 10 50.0%
  • Corals extending feeding tentacles

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Pods and other tiny life on the glass or rock

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Worms, brittle stars, or other cleanup crew

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • Crabs or shrimp out and about

    Votes: 5 25.0%
  • Bioluminescence (actual light produced by organisms)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The tank looks pretty much the same to me

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • I rarely look after lights out

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 1 5.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new