High calcium and magnesium???

steve_london_uk

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
59
Reaction score
12
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi all. So started my new RSR 350 a few weeks ago. I started with two bags of live sand, new dry rocks(Link here) , Fritz-Zyme Turbo Start, and iQuatics pro salt (Link here)

I have two clowns and a tang in there and a mixture of LPS and SPS frags.

Current levels are
Salinity: 1.027 (higher than I wanted which I need to address
PH: 8.2
Temp: 26c
Alkalinity: 6.4dkh (in process of raising with buffer)
Nitrates: 9.3ppm
Phosphates: 0.06ppm
Magnesium: 1800ppm!!!
Calcium: 550ppm!!


What could be causing the high MG and CA? I have tested the salt in fresh RO at 1.023 that I had laying around and levels were as they should as per the salt manufacturer... so why so high when I'm the tank?

- could it be because the salinity is higher?

- could there be something in the make up of the rocks that's raising them?

-Do I need to do a big water change to get them down or will it be ok to let them lower ok their own?

I look forward to any advice please. Thanks.
 

ptrusk

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 15, 2022
Messages
419
Reaction score
367
Location
Maryland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oh and raising your alkalinity will tend to lower calcium reading and vice versa. Go slow to avoid precipitation but those levels are not really anything to worry about. Just keep dosing alk slowly. Personally, I keep mine between 8 and 9 DKH.


For your reference: http://reef.diesyst.com/chemcalc/chemcalc.html
 
Last edited:

rishma

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
2,500
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A test kit I trust less than Calcium is magnesium. Some people get trustworthy results with calcium. I don’t feel like I do. Magnesium is always suspect. Not saying your results are wrong, but it’s a possibility to consider.

If it is real, I’d think perhaps it’s the salt mix if you didn’t dose anything. I am not familiar with that brand, but bad batches do happen. I suggest mixing up a batch of saltwater and testing it. That might give you some answers. If freshly mixed batch is also high, then either the salt batch is bad or the test kits are erroneous. You won’t know for sure. If the results are as expected, then we’ll have to look elsewhere.
With salifert tests. I did it there times as thought it was wrong and not working but when the secondary sample came out bang on I realised it was the tank.
 
OP
OP
S

steve_london_uk

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
59
Reaction score
12
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I did do that already and test results were pretty much bang on to what they advertise. Around 450 Ca and 1360Mg.
 

geologeek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
189
Reaction score
153
Location
UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I did do that already and test results were pretty much bang on to what they advertise. Around 450 Ca and 1360Mg.
Then I think you have your answer, the salinity has pulled the levels higher and you should retest when you bring the salinity back into check.

That said the test results are not likely accurate in the first instance and just ballpark.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,263
Reaction score
92,307
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I did do that already and test results were pretty much bang on to what they advertise. Around 450 Ca and 1360Mg.

That was at 1.023?

Then I suspect the salinity measuring device is off, reading too low, because those should not be nearly that high at sg = 1.023, and at sg = 1.027, they will be 17.4% higher than that. Brings calcium to 528 ppm.

How are you measuring salinity?
 
OP
OP
S

steve_london_uk

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
59
Reaction score
12
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That was at 1.023?

Then I suspect the salinity measuring device is off, reading too low, because those should not be nearly that high at sg = 1.023, and at sg = 1.027, they will be 17.4% higher than that. Brings calcium to 528 ppm.

How are you measuring salinity?
I have a refractometer. I'll check it's calibrated properly when I get home.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,263
Reaction score
92,307
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a refractometer. I'll check it's calibrated properly when I get home.

let's also discuss how to calibrate it. Using Ro/DI is usually not best.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,263
Reaction score
92,307
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
RO/DI is an immediate way to check it roughly, but a standard is a much better way as RO/DI may inherently be inaccurate (even when manufacturers say otherwise).


To provide a standard for refractometers requires a solution whose refractive index is similar to normal seawater. Seawater with a salinity of 35 ppt has a refractive index of 1.3394. Likewise, the refractive index of different sodium chloride solutions can be found in the scientific literature. My CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (57th Edition, Page D-252) has such a table. That table has entries for 3.6 and 3.7 weight percent solutions of sodium chloride that span the value for normal seawater. Interpolating between these data points suggests that a solution of 3.65 weight percent sodium chloride has the same refractive index as 35 ppt seawater, and therefore can be used as an appropriate standard (Table 5).

This 3.65 weight percent sodium chloride solution can be made by dissolving 3.65 grams of sodium chloride in 96.35 grams (mL) of purified freshwater. This recipe can be scaled to any appropriate size if suitable instruments are available (36.5 grams in 963.5 grams (mL) of water, 0.365 grams in 9.635 g (mL) of water, etc.).

1733243176177.png
 
OP
OP
S

steve_london_uk

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
59
Reaction score
12
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
RO/DI is an immediate way to check it roughly, but a standard is a much better way as RO/DI may inherently be inaccurate (even when manufacturers say otherwise).


To provide a standard for refractometers requires a solution whose refractive index is similar to normal seawater. Seawater with a salinity of 35 ppt has a refractive index of 1.3394. Likewise, the refractive index of different sodium chloride solutions can be found in the scientific literature. My CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (57th Edition, Page D-252) has such a table. That table has entries for 3.6 and 3.7 weight percent solutions of sodium chloride that span the value for normal seawater. Interpolating between these data points suggests that a solution of 3.65 weight percent sodium chloride has the same refractive index as 35 ppt seawater, and therefore can be used as an appropriate standard (Table 5).

This 3.65 weight percent sodium chloride solution can be made by dissolving 3.65 grams of sodium chloride in 96.35 grams (mL) of purified freshwater. This recipe can be scaled to any appropriate size if suitable instruments are available (36.5 grams in 963.5 grams (mL) of water, 0.365 grams in 9.635 g (mL) of water, etc.).

1733243176177.png
My LFS has 35ppt reference solutions so I'll check it with RODI tonight and then get some reference samples at the weekend to confirm.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 21.6%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.2%
Back
Top