- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 3
It's in my sump I just have a one of the new fluval reef led lights it not bright green like when I first bought it now looks like a dark green any help would be appreciated
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I, along with a few others that I "know of"follow the hydroponic principal: light bombardment of plant life..
What I mean is actually very simple in theory, and for cheato, works ridiculously well.. You simply throw more light on a plant, and, as long add the plant is healthy, it will grow, consuming nutrients.. But.. You need a lot of light.. In our cases, we use low wattage(150 watt) high pressure sodium mini fixtures.. With this low wattage, you don't get heat, but what you do get, is extremely strong light(11k footcandles) in the red spectrum(below 4000 Kelvin)..
When you throw one of these on your cheato, it is going to grow like crazy. What a lot of people don't realize, and it came to me all of a sudden one day, ids that, our systems are fairly low nutrient. Just like any other plant life, a small amount of light is ok to keep them alive, but, if you really want to grow, throw some real light on it. Whether these days, a small sodium, or, a full horticultural led fixture(Amazon is full of them very cheap) of at least 100 watts.. 300 works best in my experience, but, you need a lot of light.. A lot! And it will literally scrub your tank of nutrients. All of us that use these lights, as far as I know, your phosphate stays extremely low, and your nitrate generally stays close to, if not at zero..
The one consequence though, is your going to be harvesting a ton more cheato. Every week to two, at the most, or your sump is going to be literally packed full.. But, throw some more light on it.. A real light just like we use to light our coral..
And no, it doesn't need to tumble at all as long as you have enough strong light. The light will penetrate through, keeping all of it green, thick and growing. Though, d2minis cheato "death star" ball is awesome!
You don't have to add any chemicals at all. Our salt mixes, along with the food we add has all the nutrient we need to grow plant crazily. Which, just like pellets, ats and other methods that less to ulns parameters, you can then begin feeding more to your fish and not ever have to worry about it..
It actually is amazingly simple..
Same here, dont really see a big difference from higher or lower lighting. There is a difference but not big enough to increase temps in my sump or increase electricity costs.FWIW, I have not found high light to be that much of an advantage for macroalgae growth in my system. I've had my macroalgae on many different light fixtures, up to 175 w mh, and I didn't really see much more growth at the high end then with much lower wattage fluorescents.
The big drawback to using higher light levels is electricity costs.
That may indeed be the case(respectfully) in your system. However, the type of light and spectrum(halide versus sodium are very different and do very different things). For example, the 175 watt halide puts out a very different type of light than a 150 watt sodium(and much less actual light, because it's not the wattage, but the efficiency of the light source). The light intensity(candles) is not as high either with a halide(not nearly). This is coming from hydroponic experience dealing with both systems over time in both horticultural and aquatic environments..FWIW, I have not found high light to be that much of an advantage for macroalgae growth in my system. I've had my macroalgae on many different light fixtures, up to 175 w mh, and I didn't really see much more growth at the high end then with much lower wattage fluorescents.
The big drawback to using higher light levels is electricity costs.
Your using the wrong amount of light and probably light source then. My sump and tank stay the exact same temperature. Without a chiller, and even without a fan. I put a small fan on by sump to increase evaporation(get more kalk into the system, with all its inherent benefits). And my system "stays" between 77.9 and 78.4 in the summer time.. The whole goal is to increase positive effects without increasing negative effects. If a 150 watt sodium is increasing the heat in your sump, you either don't have adequate ventilation or air circulation, which can and will bring about a whole litany of other problems. Also, same thing with electricity costs, as it's a small bulb. HID yes, but not at all like even a 250 watt system whether it is halide or sodium. No where near the heat or electricity cost..Same here, dont really see a big difference from higher or lower lighting. There is a difference but not big enough to increase temps in my sump or increase electricity costs.
Thanks for the detailed reply, I have never tried a sodium nor a MH. Il definatley try a sodium after your explanation. ive tried mostly, different types of Leds, Cfls, Power compacts and even some t5s all at lower and higher wattage and intensities to find a very small difference in growth. Ill i will definatley try out a sodium though. Which bulb or fixture you reccomend?Your using the wrong amount of light and probably light source then. My sump and tank stay the exact same temperature. Without a chiller, and even without a fan. I put a small fan on by sump to increase evaporation(get more kalk into the system, with all its inherent benefits). And my system "stays" between 77.9 and 78.4 in the summer time.. The whole goal is to increase positive effects without increasing negative effects. If a 150 watt sodium is increasing the heat in your sump, you either don't have adequate ventilation or air circulation, which can and will bring about a whole litany of other problems. Also, same thing with electricity costs, as it's a small bulb. HID yes, but not at all like even a 250 watt system whether it is halide or sodium. No where near the heat or electricity cost..
I, just like everyone else I have read and discussed with, that use these systems(i thought I was crazy and only discussed with a few people previously), we experience the same crazy results: cheato growth goes insane, pods grow insane, nutrient levels literally plummet, and ph stays pretty much constant.. All because of a little 60 to 70 dollar purchase..
And the thing is, with this hobby, I have been doing it long enough with the basic "theories", that at some point I decided "do what you know".. And I know plants.. Extremely well.. With a tiny bit of practical application, different, but related, principles(horticulture above and below the root zone, freshwater plants that have co2 infection, and saltwater systems, in which we're trying to honestly scrub co2 from the system), applied to similar objects(in this case plants that both take in co2, transpire and give off oxygen in their metabolic processes), yield fantastic results in both arenas!
It's a very, very complete solution or at least massive aid in aquarium nutrient control and overall health.. Much like an algea scrubber(similar principle), with the exception, that it's below the water column..
Check Amazon. I run the sunlight supply fixture with the stock bulb. When it is time to change out the bulb,I will probably try the hortilux bulb in my fixture. Just for experimentation. But I still have a while before I need to do note that I think of it, probably a good 7 to 8 months left)..Thanks for the detailed reply, I have never tried a sodium nor a MH. Il definatley try a sodium after your explanation. ive tried mostly, different types of Leds, Cfls, Power compacts and even some t5s all at lower and higher wattage and intensities to find a very small difference in growth. Ill i will definatley try out a sodium though. Which bulb or fixture you reccomend?