I've always thought"

  • Thread starter Thread starter clowns101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

clowns101

Clown and Anemone Crazy!
View Badges
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
48
Location
Missouri
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
"I have always thought, a good photograph is like a good joke. If you have to explain it, it just isnt that good"- Anonymous

A quote I found on the internet, very popular one at that. However, what does this apply to? To me, this applys to Street Photography manily, or photos that are taking during war, etc. Where there is alot of action. But is it limited to that? I know as a photographer some people will say it can apply to all images, but how is that correct?

What does it apply to?
 
Just like a good joke, you either "get it" or you don't. Not everyone has the same sense of humor.
 
I get the quote, but what Im saying is, can this apply to all photography, or only certian ones.
 
I don't think it would apply to all photography. Many subject-specific photographs would require explaining to the lay person. Macro photography of some corals would be an example.

CJ
 
I think it would apply to almost all journalistic photography as there's usually a story there and you want the image to convey or add to the story.

Some pictures are more simple and explain themselves easily like wedding photos or portraits. They are just people in a situation which is easy to distinguish.

Macro photography as well as animal photography can require some explaining as some may not know what they are even looking at.
 
IMO, it's a rare photo that needs explanation. Before you expose the sensor/film, you should have a reason for making the image, i.e., a visual story you want to tell, something unique you want the viewer to see, or something common you want people to view in a new/better/different way. If you have to explain it, for the most part, it's a bad photo or a snapshot in which you have to list the family members and mention the event for it to have meaning. I don't believe macro photos, coral or otherwise, need explanation. They should stand on their own for their composition, shapes, textures, and/or colors. If, after the viewer sees the image, the additional information that it's a photo of coral, flower, leaf, enhances the viewing experience, so much the better.
Gary
 
Makes since, I just wasnt sure, Im still foggy on it.
 
"I have always thought, a good quote is like a good joke. If you have to explain it, it just isnt that good"- Brahm

;)
 

WHEN YOU SEE A REEF2REEF POLL, WHAT’S YOUR USUAL MOVE?

  • Vote right away, then head to the comments

    Votes: 15 42.9%
  • Read the comments first...then decide what I think

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • Vote and explain my choice in the comments

    Votes: 3 8.6%
  • Dude, I just vote...I don't care about the comments

    Votes: 14 40.0%
  • Vote, then come back later to see how it turned out

    Votes: 3 8.6%
  • Pick “Other” because my opinion is too nuanced to fit any of your simpleton boxes

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • I usually read the comments but exercise my right not to vote

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I always get excited about Daniel’s daily polls, obviously 😎

    Votes: 3 8.6%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 3 8.6%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new