Jumping straight from kalk only to kalk + CaRX?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeveSSL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

NeveSSL

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
2,734
Reaction score
264
Location
Kodak
What state or country do you live in
Tennessee
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Hi everyone,

My tank is a little over a year old, but I'm just now really getting it going. Adding corals. They're growing. Kalk is largely keeping up, but it won't be long I'll need more. I had originally planned on doing the normal 2 part plus kalk. But then I got a great deal on a calcium reactor. Any reason not to skip two part and go straight to the calcium reactor? It wouldn't need to output much at all. Maybe this would be a waste of CO2 vs two part? My current tank is a Red Sea 750XL V3. Basically a rimless 160 with 180 dimensions. I have a 90g frag tank I'll be setting up soon, so I don't think it will be long before my demand goes up quite a bit. That'll hopefully be setup in about a month.

Anything I'm missing?

Brandon
 

WHEN YOU SEE A REEF2REEF POLL, WHAT’S YOUR USUAL MOVE?

  • Vote right away, then head to the comments

    Votes: 11 40.7%
  • Read the comments first...then decide what I think

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Vote and explain my choice in the comments

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Dude, I just vote...I don't care about the comments

    Votes: 12 44.4%
  • Vote, then come back later to see how it turned out

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Pick “Other” because my opinion is too nuanced to fit any of your simpleton boxes

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • I usually read the comments but exercise my right not to vote

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I always get excited about Daniel’s daily polls, obviously 😎

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 3 11.1%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new