Jumping straight from kalk only to kalk + CaRX?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeveSSL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

NeveSSL

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
2,734
Reaction score
264
Location
Kodak
What state or country do you live in
Tennessee
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Hi everyone,

My tank is a little over a year old, but I'm just now really getting it going. Adding corals. They're growing. Kalk is largely keeping up, but it won't be long I'll need more. I had originally planned on doing the normal 2 part plus kalk. But then I got a great deal on a calcium reactor. Any reason not to skip two part and go straight to the calcium reactor? It wouldn't need to output much at all. Maybe this would be a waste of CO2 vs two part? My current tank is a Red Sea 750XL V3. Basically a rimless 160 with 180 dimensions. I have a 90g frag tank I'll be setting up soon, so I don't think it will be long before my demand goes up quite a bit. That'll hopefully be setup in about a month.

Anything I'm missing?

Brandon
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT’S THE HARDEST PART OF REEFING TO EXPLAIN TO A NON-REEFER?

  • Why a tiny coral frag can cost that much

    Votes: 22 28.6%
  • Why I spend time testing and adjusting water

    Votes: 11 14.3%
  • Why the fish I want might not fit my tank

    Votes: 11 14.3%
  • Why I have buckets, tubing, and salt around the house

    Votes: 4 5.2%
  • Why corals are living animals, not decorations

    Votes: 20 26.0%
  • How much time and attention a reef takes

    Votes: 22 28.6%
  • The difference between freshwater and saltwater creatures

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • I’ve stopped trying to explain

    Votes: 23 29.9%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 10 13.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new