thats cool and all but not everyone has a sen eye where they can see the pur in their tanks - thats a whole nother thing where you have to spend 300+ dollars just to find out what your lights are putting out - that to me is one of the most ridiculous things ever radion does a good job of having charts and graphs for ppl - but i think if i put a light on my tank hang it 12 from the waterline i should be able to plug it in and grow whatever i want without having to adjust anything or set it or whatever - they should have like 10 questions or something how many lights - tank dimensions - sps dominant - lps dominant - mixed - softy or fowler - and not all this other jibber jabber par - pur ect ect - i would think there would be a better solution to this
i run t5 on one setup and led on another and yeah im not sure my 6bulb HO ati bulbs are enough for the sps but i do know they are too much for my lps so its like hmmmmm what im a ganna do ??? just got another tank to plumb into it so i can run sps frags in one tank lps frags in another tank and i have no clue what im going to use when i get a full on display tank - to many variables
Only spent like 100 on the Seneye, it is a great tool to use as another form of testing. Lights are just another component to test for. Cost about price of a coral. Plus I enjoy the learning, who cares anyway besides my wife what I spend money on? Didn't have to I can.
I've been running leds for around 5 years without any form of "test" & I wasn't as successful as I wanted to be.
It isn't about pur par or whatever, its actually getting a relative number to gauge by, & I want to leave the lights at, so I know where and how certain corals will act as I can react. Yes there are too many variables, but its nice to know if it is or isnt a lighting issue.
I find many either under or over compensate the intensities.