Minimum tank size requirement for fish

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
Quite the opposite in my experience. The bigger the tank the lower the maintenance because it’s easier to catch problems before they get serious. Serious problems means serious expense.

The start up cost of large tanks is the only thing that’s more expensive. A 29 gallon is the smallest I would ever consider running again. A 50 is the smallest I would be happy with long term.
As long as total volume of water is same; display tank being small and refugium being big. Maintenance should be same or less trouble
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

IF ONE SYSTEM FAILED WHILE YOU WERE AWAY, WHICH WOULD WORRY YOU MOST?

  • Power or backup power

    Votes: 12 27.9%
  • Heating or cooling

    Votes: 2 4.7%
  • Auto top-off

    Votes: 3 7.0%
  • Return pump or water circulation

    Votes: 4 9.3%
  • Dosing or automated testing

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Plumbing, overflow, or leaks

    Votes: 5 11.6%
  • Tank sitter or remote monitoring

    Votes: 2 4.7%
  • Electrical failure of some sort

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • Seam or structure failure

    Votes: 11 25.6%
  • Something else (tell us in the comments)

    Votes: 3 7.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new