Minimum tank size requirement for fish

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
Quite the opposite in my experience. The bigger the tank the lower the maintenance because it’s easier to catch problems before they get serious. Serious problems means serious expense.

The start up cost of large tanks is the only thing that’s more expensive. A 29 gallon is the smallest I would ever consider running again. A 50 is the smallest I would be happy with long term.
As long as total volume of water is same; display tank being small and refugium being big. Maintenance should be same or less trouble
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT DO YOU ALWAYS RUN OUT OF AT THE WORST TIME?

  • Salt mix

    Votes: 12 16.4%
  • Fish or coral food

    Votes: 4 5.5%
  • Test kits or reagents

    Votes: 7 9.6%
  • Filter media or replacement fleece

    Votes: 4 5.5%
  • RO/DI filters or supplies

    Votes: 12 16.4%
  • Fragging and repair supplies, like glue or epoxy

    Votes: 8 11.0%
  • I keep a backup of everything

    Votes: 20 27.4%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 6 8.2%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new