Minimum tank size requirement for fish

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
Quite the opposite in my experience. The bigger the tank the lower the maintenance because it’s easier to catch problems before they get serious. Serious problems means serious expense.

The start up cost of large tanks is the only thing that’s more expensive. A 29 gallon is the smallest I would ever consider running again. A 50 is the smallest I would be happy with long term.
As long as total volume of water is same; display tank being small and refugium being big. Maintenance should be same or less trouble
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHEN NUISANCE ALGAE OR CYANO FIRST APPEARS, WHAT DO YOU DO FIRST?

  • Manually remove it and observe

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • Retest nutrients and other parameters

    Votes: 2 10.5%
  • Adjust flow or lighting

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Reduce or change feeding

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Add or strengthen the cleanup crew

    Votes: 4 21.1%
  • Improve filtration or nutrient export

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Use a targeted treatment

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Wait and let the tank find its balance

    Votes: 8 42.1%
  • Phone a friend...

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends (explain in the comments)

    Votes: 3 15.8%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new