Prey density for marine larvae

LordJoshaeus

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
565
Reaction score
514
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi everyone! Sorry for posting so much the past few days, I just had problems finding this elsewhere...I have read that marine fry need a specific prey density range - too low and the larvae spend more calories hunting than they gain from digesting their prey, too high and the fry eat too much and much of the prey animal's nutritional value is not assimilated properly. My question is, what is this ideal prey density range a breeder should be shooting for? Thanks :)
 
OP
OP
LordJoshaeus

LordJoshaeus

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
565
Reaction score
514
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks! Funny enough, I found an answer after posting this...a thesis on rearing mandarinfish larvae found that 1+ copepod nauplii per ml worked well.
 

Skydvr

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
574
Reaction score
265
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Got a link to that thesis?

Getting ready to start working with Psuedochromis fridmani (orchid dottyback) and some roundtail clowns (though I may get rid of them before they start putting down nests, I really don't like clowns and swore I would never own them). There are a couple of dragonetts on my list, but I haven't really started doing research on breeding them yet.
 

Skydvr

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
574
Reaction score
265
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It seems to vary a little bit by species. Most of what I have seen so far is typically a little over 1/mL, but less than 2/mL.

What I read was more along the lines of constantly bumping into prey items and basically being overwhelmed or they stop recognizing them as prey items with the overload, leading to a reduced feeding rate.
Overloading the gut, leaving a lower dwell time, resulting in less nutrition gained seems a bit more plausible with an undeveloped digestive tract, especially with a species like dragonetts or pipefish that tend to have relatively short, inefficient digestive tracts (so the theory goes). At least this would seem to be more plausible if they don't have a mechanism to tell them that they are full or to turn off the feeding trigger from moving prey items.
 
OP
OP
LordJoshaeus

LordJoshaeus

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
565
Reaction score
514
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Got a link to that thesis?

Getting ready to start working with Psuedochromis fridmani (orchid dottyback) and some roundtail clowns (though I may get rid of them before they start putting down nests, I really don't like clowns and swore I would never own them). There are a couple of dragonetts on my list, but I haven't really started doing research on breeding them yet.
Here you go! The copepod in question is Parvocalanus;

 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 54 41.2%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.8%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 51 38.9%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 39 29.8%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new