Quarantine In-Line w Main System?

naterealbig

pea brain
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Winter Garden
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
While I'm a huge proponent of prophylactic quarantine of corals and fish, I don't have the room to set up a permanent system for corals and fish.

Quarantined fish are easy enough to come by these days, so not a huge obstacle there.

The quarantining of corals to prevent the spread of fish AND coral pathogens is what I want to accomplish - all inside of the main system.

Theoretically, a UV placed on the return line plumbing would prevent the spread of disease (Ich, AEFW, Uronema, Red Bugs, etc) to the main tank while any new corals undergo a 76 day isolation/treatment period in my sump.

The question is : What sized UV would I need (assuming a 2-5x per hour turnover rate) for an 80 gallon display in order to achieve a 100% kill/sterilization rate?

Thanks in advance - Nathan
 

trevorhiller

Reefing Nurse
View Badges
Joined
Oct 22, 2021
Messages
1,052
Reaction score
752
Location
Williamsport
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
My understanding is UV is most effective against microscopic bacteria and other single-called organisms. I think you would miss a lot of the more “complex” macroscopic multicellular life forms. Similar to how a UV doesn’t wipe out copepods.

Even for Ich, the UV dose is rather high for a 100% sterilization rate.

I am curious what others thoughts are on this, but I don’t think it would be effective or practical with any reasonably sized UVs.
 

EeyoreIsMySpiritAnimal

Just another girl who likes fish
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2019
Messages
13,411
Reaction score
19,928
Location
Spring, Texas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
While I'm a huge proponent of prophylactic quarantine of corals and fish, I don't have the room to set up a permanent system for corals and fish.

Quarantined fish are easy enough to come by these days, so not a huge obstacle there.

The quarantining of corals to prevent the spread of fish AND coral pathogens is what I want to accomplish - all inside of the main system.

Theoretically, a UV placed on the return line plumbing would prevent the spread of disease (Ich, AEFW, Uronema, Red Bugs, etc) to the main tank while any new corals undergo a 76 day isolation/treatment period in my sump.

The question is : What sized UV would I need (assuming a 2-5x per hour turnover rate) for an 80 gallon display in order to achieve a 100% kill/sterilization rate?

Thanks in advance - Nathan
If it were that easy, everyone would have a UV sterilizer and no one's tank would have ich...
 

Jekyl

GSP is the devil and clowns are bad pets
View Badges
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
11,521
Reaction score
15,862
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
UV at best takes care of what it can from the water. It does not take care of the entire life cycle of ich. It helps, not eliminates, at best.
 
OP
OP
naterealbig

naterealbig

pea brain
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Winter Garden
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
My understanding is UV is most effective against microscopic bacteria and other single-called organisms. I think you would miss a lot of the more “complex” macroscopic multicellular life forms. Similar to how a UV doesn’t wipe out copepods.

Even for Ich, the UV dose is rather high for a 100% sterilization rate.

I am curious what others thoughts are on this, but I don’t think it would be effective or practical with any reasonably sized UVs.

That is what I figured. I know that UV dosage rates are readily available for Ich, but I wasn't sure about other organisms.

Thanks for your reply, and let's see if anyone else chimes in.
 
OP
OP
naterealbig

naterealbig

pea brain
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Winter Garden
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
If it were that easy, everyone would have a UV sterilizer and no one's tank would have ich...

You're missing the point of my post.

I'm looking only to prevent Ich from making it to the display while I wait for the Ich in the fishless sump to die off.

I'm not looking to eradicate it from a system with fish.
 
OP
OP
naterealbig

naterealbig

pea brain
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Winter Garden
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
UV at best takes care of what it can from the water. It does not take care of the entire life cycle of ich. It helps, not eliminates, at best.

Right, but but eliminating the Ich from the water column is all I need.

If the sump is fishless, the corals are kept in the sump, and 100% of the water from the sump to the display goes through the UV them I should be good.

The real question is whether things like AEFW, and other things can make it to the display and reproduce.
 

W3ish3ng

New Member
View Badges
Joined
May 30, 2022
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Singapore
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, I’m thinking of the same for the new build once I move house.

display will be a 120 gallon, running two return pipe with a Aqua uv 57 watts on each at around 350gph each which should give me 280,000uws.

Drain pipe will go through clarisea filter which I believe is 25 microns then a separate feed pump will run water to a hang on acrylic tank with its output going into 5 micron 7 inch socks which will then go to skimmer compartment which will have an ozone running at low dose 24/7.

generally I think this will work? Also I can try to run ttm if I get 2 of the same acrylic hang on tank.
 
OP
OP
naterealbig

naterealbig

pea brain
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2018
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
2,585
Location
Winter Garden
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
For additional (more specific) discussion on what I'm trying to accomplish :

 

forestsofkelp

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
162
Reaction score
135
Location
Southern California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been looking into UV. Its really for small, small organisms. Doses for flatworms/red bugs etc are not known...does it kill their eggs? sterilize their young? are those phases waterborne? I don't know.

UV at the proper dose will kill bacteria, viruses, and small organisms in the water column. Its a helper, not a cure. Personally I think the ich and bacteria control is worth it. Ich eradication is best but not always possible.

"What sized UV would I need (assuming a 2-5x per hour turnover rate) for an 80 gallon display in order to achieve a 100% kill/sterilization rate? I apologize the units may not be right but the numbers should be"

UV dose for egg theronts is about 280,000 uWs/cm2.
So you are looking for 160-400gph @ 280,000 uWs/cm2
If you look at the chart for pentair, for example, their 120S gives you 180mj/cm2 @ 10.6gpm, or 600 gph. (180mj=180,000 uWs)
At half the flow rate, your exposure doubles. So 498 gph gives you 360 mj/cm2. They correlate inversely. So to get 280mj, you have to increase that 180mj dose by 1.5 factor, so the flow decreases by 1.5, or 400gph.

So to me it looks like the 120S pentair would give you the exposure you want at 5x tank turnover. You could probably get away with 2-3x turnover and get a smaller unit. For pests, usually 1-2x tank turnover is recommended, I have no experience with UV, just have been reading about it a lot recently.

I dont know if it will do what you want it to do. A separate system, even a tub, is probably better, if that is *not possible* a UV is probably your best bet.

I had no ich then didnt QT one fish because I was an idiot, and now I have ich. Now I have to QT and will probably get a sterilizer too. Dont be me.
 

High pressure shells: Do you look for signs of stress in the invertebrates in your reef tank?

  • I regularly look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 42 31.1%
  • I occasionally look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 31 23.0%
  • I rarely look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 28 20.7%
  • I never look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 34 25.2%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top