Regal Angel and SPS

  • Thread starter Thread starter clowndude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
My tank was only 60 gal plus my sump, so I had a much smaller footprint, and probably fewer SPS because of it. Could be the difference between yours not keeping up and mine going it.

If I go reef with the new tank, I doubt it'll keep up on the 200 DD, haha
 
Was it a bad batch of salt? Were you mixing to 1.026? I use RC as well and @ 1.026 I'm reading around 480 on a salifert and an Elos kit
 
Last edited:
I've always used RC, and never had that high of a reading on calcium before. I mix mine to about 1.024, which I use 1/2 cup per gallon of water.
 
Was this the old stuff from a few years ago, before they changed it a bit, or was it a recent batch. Even the sticky in the chemistry forum is saying 490 for RC
 
Weird because I'm running IO and mine mixes to 420cal and 9 alk. My tank stays around 420cal and alk stays right at 9. Of course I live in San Antonio where the water is hard as heck so even run through a RO/DI unit still probably comes out pretty hard water. I'm hoping that running a kalk+2 or three part will trigger excelled growth for the sps.
 

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 12 28.6%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 6 14.3%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 6 14.3%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 10 23.8%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 21.4%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 8 19.0%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 4.8%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 3 7.1%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 1 2.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new