show your fluval evo 13.5

EagleEye121

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 20, 2020
Messages
420
Reaction score
640
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I never measured PAR when I had the Evo running, but in my current IM Nuvo 40, PAR at the top middle of the rockscape is in the 330 range with (2) Prime 16s running the schedule above
572673C8-75C0-4820-9A2B-7A706FAB5CF6.jpeg
 

nickscorals

nano reefing in the big city 🏙️
View Badges
Joined
Oct 20, 2019
Messages
1,218
Reaction score
1,446
Location
Brooklyn
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When my tank has coral a few months from now I will post it on here, and mark my words I'll get a reef tank 365 :cool:
 

Salty716

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
948
Location
Buffalo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Any running a radion gen 4 Pro on this tank
Seems a little overkill. I recently added /month and a half ago) a prime 16HD from a Kessil A80 and had to tone back the power at 10” off the water level.
 

Boyley

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 22, 2021
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Location
Leeds England
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Seems a little overkill. I recently added /month and a half ago) a prime 16HD from a Kessil A80 and had to tone back the power at 10” off the water level.
Yeah got a bargain on it so thought why not just finding it hard to get the right settings which both looks nice and gets good growth
Seems a little overkill. I recently added /month and a half ago) a prime 16HD from a Kessil A80 and had to tone back the power at 10” off the water level.
 

Andresnyc93

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 21, 2021
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
669
Location
New York City
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Currently running mine without a skimmer, my nems love it and using uv Chemi-pure and purigen and running chaeto. Built a custom refugium on first chamber with the intank mods
 

Attachments

  • 07501C33-CBAF-4FDD-B49B-DF46698E21A8.jpeg
    07501C33-CBAF-4FDD-B49B-DF46698E21A8.jpeg
    247.3 KB · Views: 136
  • 09409E51-26E3-4A6C-A3DF-B505A08538B8.jpeg
    09409E51-26E3-4A6C-A3DF-B505A08538B8.jpeg
    324.8 KB · Views: 154

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 21.6%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.2%
Back
Top