Slimmer pump in vs out

ryshark

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
5,438
Reaction score
6,727
Location
SoCal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Figuring there’s enough space inside the sump, is a skimmer typically more efficient when the pump is not inside the body like the space saver skimmers that have the pump inside? For comparison, let’s say the same brand, size body and pump skimmer in space saver style vs normal pump outside the body.
 

Blitheran

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
980
Reaction score
2,174
Location
california
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
if you look at brs videos they talk about skimmer. Space savor vs not. And the difference is the pump on the outside of the skimmer will allow more contact time with the air bubbles and tank water which will be more efficient in removing undissolved organic waste
 

Elegance Coral

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 29, 2014
Messages
560
Reaction score
670
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I personally can't stand the space savers. Yes they serve a purpose, buy you will need to service the pump from time to time. Removing the whole skimmer to do that, is a royal pain.
 

James77

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
282
Reaction score
272
Location
Providence, RI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It would be a little more efficient outside the body, but IME its not all that substantial. They still have bubble plates and you are only losing an inch or two of contact area. I run a Reef Octopus 200 space saver, and it has been one of the top performing skimmers I have had. One beating it was a recirculating one and ones it has beat are ATB cones and vertex Omega. I would likely buy it again even if I didn't need the space.

Cleaning is a bit more a pain in the a, but not all that bad. Its more complicated if you want to service just the pump, but I have always performed a full cleaning on all the skimmers I have had whenever I feel the need to clean the pumps. Given that most skimmers nowadays can have the body taken apart, there is only a couple extra steps. It probably adds 2 minutes to my cleaning time.
 
OP
OP
ryshark

ryshark

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
5,438
Reaction score
6,727
Location
SoCal
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It would be a little more efficient outside the body, but IME its not all that substantial. They still have bubble plates and you are only losing an inch or two of contact area. I run a Reef Octopus 200 space saver, and it has been one of the top performing skimmers I have had. One beating it was a recirculating one and ones it has beat are ATB cones and vertex Omega. I would likely buy it again even if I didn't need the space.

Cleaning is a bit more a pain in the a, but not all that bad. Its more complicated if you want to service just the pump, but I have always performed a full cleaning on all the skimmers I have had whenever I feel the need to clean the pumps. Given that most skimmers nowadays can have the body taken apart, there is only a couple extra steps. It probably adds 2 minutes to my cleaning time.
I have a reef octopus space saver 150 and I hate taking the top off to drain the skimmate, it’s ridiculously hard to get off. I won’t buy one again just because of that.
 

James77

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
282
Reaction score
272
Location
Providence, RI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a reef octopus space saver 150 and I hate taking the top off to drain the skimmate, it’s ridiculously hard to get off. I won’t buy one again just because of that.

I'm using the Regal space saver, the clearance is like 1/2" it just sits on top help in place by a silicone o ring. But yeah there are some poor designs out there.
 

Being sticky and staying connected: Have you used any reef-safe glue?

  • I have used reef safe glue.

    Votes: 99 87.6%
  • I haven’t used reef safe glue, but plan to in the future.

    Votes: 6 5.3%
  • I have no interest in using reef safe glue.

    Votes: 5 4.4%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 2.7%
Back
Top