Sulfur Denitrator Help

Ed Kaz

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2022
Messages
58
Reaction score
16
Location
Northeastern, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi, I have been trying to re-start my Korallin Biodenitrator S1502 and can't seem to get it going? It ran GREAT for a year ... 4 months ago I tore it down to clean due to the crap that was in it. Cleaned with DI water and replaced media (DELTA High Purity Sulfur Reactor Meda). When I started the reactor I ran the output wide open for a few days then lowered output drip rate to a drip a second for the last 4 months. The nitrates levels still have not changed in 12 weeks ? Nitrates @ 80ppm from reactor output. Is there something I can dose to seed reactor (would MicroBacter 7 or something else work?). I have some BioDigest and Bioptim that I have not used (was going a different route with a Reef Octopus bio-churn reactor) I could not find a "freshness date" on box? Just was wondering why or what bacteria is needed. The only thing I dose is All for Reef. Tank is 300gal. and been set-up for over 17 years mostly fish only (porcupine puffer makes a mess!) with a few rose anemones and hammerhead corals.

Thanks for any Help
Ed
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,799
Reaction score
93,396
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I do not know if any commercial bacteria additives have species that will colonize the sulfur, but I would doubt it.

Have you tried upping the flow or measuring nitrate in the effluent?
 
OP
OP
E

Ed Kaz

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2022
Messages
58
Reaction score
16
Location
Northeastern, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Randy, thanks for getting back to me. By effluent, do you mean the reactor output? Yes, this is where I measured it with a hanna digital tester. I sure can increase the output flow, but I thought very slow drips are what is needed so bacteria can colonize, then increase flow? Attached is the instructions from korallin...
Thank Again
20260504_093644.jpg
20260504_093716.jpg
 
OP
OP
E

Ed Kaz

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2022
Messages
58
Reaction score
16
Location
Northeastern, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I will give it a few more weeks and then pitch it....
BTW:
Do you have any opinion on the Reef Octopus bio-churn reactor? Is it worth the trouble?
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,326
Reaction score
23,922
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It took around 2 months for my no3 reactor to get effluent to zero. I used a Kamoer and pulled from the sump. It takes time so no hurry.
I actually took mine offline and dose vodka now. Simple, easy , and effective.
20241103_124714.jpg
 
OP
OP
E

Ed Kaz

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 2, 2022
Messages
58
Reaction score
16
Location
Northeastern, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It took around 2 months for my no3 reactor to get effluent to zero. I used a Kamoer and pulled from the sump. It takes time so no hurry.
I actually took mine offline and dose vodka now. Simple, easy , and effective.
20241103_124714.jpg
I have been in it for 4 months! No change? It hurts nothing to run it. Like I said I will give it a few weeks. Thanks
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,326
Reaction score
23,922
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Slow the drip rate down until the effluent is zero and adjust from there. If effluent is the same no3 as the tank it needs more dwell time to lower it.
If its been 4 months it is going to fast through the reactor.

It may not hurt anything but it will lower the ph of your system.
 

adamsfour

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 26, 2019
Messages
267
Reaction score
121
Location
Leesburg
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just a guess I suspect it could be the sulfur you used. I am using a Deltec reactor with their sulfur and it took 4 weeks to reach zero.
 

Dr. Reef

www.drreefsquarantinedfish.com
View Badges
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
4,319
Reaction score
7,537
Location
Tulsa, OK
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
I have used sulphur denitrators for decades. Advise given above is correct. You need to slow it down till No3 hits low to 0 then open it up slowly and keep on increasing slowly making small adjustments daily openning its flow up till desired levels are reached.

Bacteria you are looking for need 0 oxygen environment, That will not be achieved with moderate flow running through. This is why you have to slow it down and cause the bacteria to grow and once they grow, do not open the flow fast. always make very very small adjustments keeping bacteria alive away from O2.
 
Last edited:

backbayreef

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2022
Messages
4,174
Reaction score
5,397
Location
Orange County
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

aussiejohnny

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 17, 2026
Messages
49
Reaction score
36
Location
sydney
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i had a sera bio denitrator 40 yrs ago (yeah im older ) used to have tablets that went in the top of the dripper ..water dripped over them into the main reactor ..i am probably wrong but i think it was like a carbon source ...i remember the starting drip rate was 15 drops per minute took 2 months to do anything and when it did get going had to speed up the drops an test nitrate either end each day ..worked great but so fiddly ..rather use nopox..same result
 

backbayreef

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 1, 2022
Messages
4,174
Reaction score
5,397
Location
Orange County
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
NoPox (or carbon dosing methods) did not work for me since the process generated too much nasty slime in the sump, clogging up reactors! On big tanks, you’ll need to increase the carbon source up to 60-70mL to be effective.

I do 10mL of vodka on my 90gal & 150gal tanks and it’s stupidly easy and low maintenance.
 

JumboShrimp

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
9,377
Reaction score
12,897
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I gave up on mine. 😞 In fact I have a second unopened one still in the box. (I did a long R2R thread on my experiences.) Sounds like you are getting good advice here.. hang in there, I blame myself. Lol.
 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 14 32.6%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 3 7.0%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 19 44.2%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 14 32.6%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new