- Joined
- Dec 28, 2016
- Messages
- 22,829
- Reaction score
- 21,964
If you are a scientist, why do you not read the links provided? They have provided answers to both of these two questions.
If you are a scientist, why do you continue to use No True Scotsman arguments to refute studies that you obviously haven't read?
If you are scientist, why haven't you offered a scientific argument on why you cannot use the ratio of nutrient consumption to determine what bacteria need to survive and/or thrive?
You even use strawman arguments to try and make points.
I was warned by multiple people that you are well known as a troll. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt. You have proven them correct. You have offered nothing of value to this thread. I am going to kindly ask that you cease posting on it.
I wont post anymore - I wont answer your questions above. I will suggest that this post says a lot more about you than me. Happy Thanksgiving. Signed - The Troll lol