Here’s the way I look at this dilemma:
In our tanks (relatively small volume H2O with large biomass in a relatively closed system), we have all of the potential PO4 and NO3 production we could ever want.
That led to, over the years, advancements in our LSS capabilities, chem media capabilities, and things like dosing to further lower nutrient levels. We then went from one side of the issue (too much) to the other side of the issue (too little).
The word you used that got my attention was ‘practical’. To me, how is more practical than contriving even more chem to deal with/control/manipulate than it is to simply dial back the use of nutrient stripping _____? Why add an additional nitrate source when we can just reduce skimming or nutrient uptake by Chaeto or whatever we’re doing to decrease NO3 or PO4?
I removed cheato about 8-9 moths ago to see if it helped them I about 2-3 months ago edited my skimmer to run only 12 hours was still getting zero on salifert. I do skim fairly dry my skimmate is very dark and gunts up fairly fast on the inner chamber of the skimmer and collection cup it’s like a paste when I clean it weekly after I started with the 4-5 feeds a day, would wet skimming be better to reduce export of nutrients?