I came to this conclusion after using multiple red sea kits while simultaneously using other manufacturers kits to see what a base line average was.Who is to say that what you measured from another kit is right? Or that you are not accidently making an error with the other test's? And then altering the red sea test to make it match. That's a very slippery slope. For the record, I am not arguing that red sea is the best. Imo it's about .5-1dkh either way off from my hanna. But altering a test just to make it match another may just mean duplicating inaccurate results.
According to the ones I used....red sea was always 1.5 or 2dkh higher this is also while using a trident.
Let's say red sea says I'm at 12 dkh and giessmann says I am at 10 dkh.
If I used the red sea and wanted to aim for a 7-8 dkh in my tank I would need to lower my dkh by 4-5 dkh.
This is where my problem lies. If I use giessmann and it says my dkh is at 10 and I lower it 4-5dkh then I'm in a dangerous area.
I did this so I would not get into that dangerous area with red sea.
Yes I'm over thinking it but I did not like that area of variance. My tanks are much happier after not using red sea to test for alk. This is just a personal opinion.
I hope that made sense.
Last edited: