Are trace elements really that important?

tırıvırıı

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 27, 2026
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Location
istanbul
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are trace elements really that important for an SPS-dominant system?
I'm thinking of using BRS, CA, KH, and MG. With weekly water changes in a full SPS tank, will I experience losses in acros without adding trace elements?
 

Subsea

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
8,925
Reaction score
11,554
Location
Austin, Tx
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
YES, TRACE ELEMENTS ARE IMPORTANT. And trace elements are added with water change schedule.

No one can answer that question about your system untill you include MORE data:

How much water change in how much system volume?
Density of SPS & specific species?

Keep it simple:
If dosing trace elements and testing equipment are not desirable than increase water change volumes.

I have large systems with no alkalinity demanding corals, so I don’t fret trace minerals. I also use passive alkalinity management in agroggonite sand beds by allowing nighttime pH drop.
 
Last edited:

Gumbies R Us

God, Bouldering, and Reefing
View Badges
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
28,944
Reaction score
51,298
Location
North Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,239
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are two issues here. (A) is the question you asked, and (B) is an important one you did not ask.

(A)
Trace elements from some source are critically important.

The benefit of dosing any or many will depend entirely on what the other sources of them are in any given tank. IMO, the main source is foods of various types, including fish foods and coral foods.

Water changes can also supply some. Tap water supplies some.

The only way to know more in any given tank is by:

1. Getting an ICP-MS test (such as by Oceamo) and then seeing if any important elements are too low.
2. Trying dosing a trace element mix, such as Tropic Marin A and K and seeing if the tank seems any different after a week or so. One can also just add the mix indefinitely.

The combination of 1 and then experimental testing of things that seem low on paper is probably the best way to know with confidence, but 2 alone is a big step forward.

(B)
If you dose just the solutions you mention, a very large number of major, minor and trace elements will get pushed down, and it is desirable to use an additional material that maintains them. Tropic Marin Balling Part C and Aquaforest mineral salt serve this purpose. This is NOT a replacement for trace element supplementation and should not be used for that purpose.

This set of recipes shows what to use:


and this article details why this additional part is needed:
 

Kooma

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 7, 2025
Messages
754
Reaction score
679
Location
Ontario
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes.

Now go take your multi-vitamin you’ve been ignoring.
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,073
Reaction score
23,041
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In my 15g I dose no trace elements. In my acro dominant 150 I dose trace elements.
In my 15 I do 20% WC 2× a month.
30+ mixed reef corals, 3 fish.
I feed all systems heavy including the 15.
Floss, carbon, and WC for nutrient export.
20lbs Live rock and sand is the key to nutrient control in this small system.
20251215_122831.jpg
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top