Bean Animal Elbow help please

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shawn7854
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
I see absolutely no difference in having the secondary open in the overflow vs having an elbow with a hole? Please explain, the only con I see with the elbow there is no surface skimming but no benefit?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5409.mov
    48 MB
Explained in detail just a few posts back.
 
Explained in detail just a few posts back.
I tried the elbow and if I increase the flow I hear the same noise in the secondary as without the elbow, example if I add a powerhead sometimes more water goes through the overflow like a wavemaker example or high flow uptop random and I heard water trickling “annoying” noise in secondary with the elbow + rodi tubing in the hole vs without elbow same noise, what am I doing wrong with the elbow to have it muffled?
 
Hello guys,

I am getting ready to setup the new plumbing for my running DT. I have purchased the Modular Marine 800GPH Bean Animal style overflow box. The issue I'm having while testing the setup dry, is that I cannot fit 2x 90 elbows back to back for 2 of the 3 pipes inside the box. I can only fit one elbow, and I'm wondering if that will be enough to have a full syphon with no noise as all of the bean animal setup I've seen, have 2x elbow creating a 'U' shape inside the box.

Can someone please let me know if just one 90 elbow on two of the 3 pipes will suffice for a silent complete drain?
 
Hello guys,

I am getting ready to setup the new plumbing for my running DT. I have purchased the Modular Marine 800GPH Bean Animal style overflow box. The issue I'm having while testing the setup dry, is that I cannot fit 2x 90 elbows back to back for 2 of the 3 pipes inside the box. I can only fit one elbow, and I'm wondering if that will be enough to have a full syphon with no noise as all of the bean animal setup I've seen, have 2x elbow creating a 'U' shape inside the box.

Can someone please let me know if just one 90 elbow on two of the 3 pipes will suffice for a silent complete drain?
Personally, I wouldn't use the elbows on any of the drains.
 
Hello guys,

I am getting ready to setup the new plumbing for my running DT. I have purchased the Modular Marine 800GPH Bean Animal style overflow box. The issue I'm having while testing the setup dry, is that I cannot fit 2x 90 elbows back to back for 2 of the 3 pipes inside the box. I can only fit one elbow, and I'm wondering if that will be enough to have a full syphon with no noise as all of the bean animal setup I've seen, have 2x elbow creating a 'U' shape inside the box.

Can someone please let me know if just one 90 elbow on two of the 3 pipes will suffice for a silent complete drain?

Personally, I wouldn't use the elbows on any of the drains.

The need for elbows is dependent on the overflow box dimensions and flow. In some cases they may not be needed. In others, they are absolutely required.

For the full siphon standpipe an open top can allow a vortex to form. This will make the siphon unstable, as well as noisy. Deeper overflows do not have this issue.

For the open channel standpipe an open top can aid in system starting, but it can also create a good bit of noise as the water splashes down the pipe and the noise is amplified out of the open top. The open top also makes the fail-safe mode less sensitive -- meaning that it takes a bit higher water level to transform it into a full siphon. This may or may not be an issue depending on return pump flow and tank flood headroom.

If there is only room for a singe elbow and the water height above the standpipe is shallow, it will likely need to go on the siphon. If the overflow box is deeper and works without forming a vortex then it ma be better served on quieting any noise echoing from the open channel.

The system operates as designed and published. Altering aspects of the system may (will) alter the behavior. How that behavior changes is both dependent on the changes and the environment that the system is run in.

As or the Innovative Marine overflow using my design, I know nothing about it, nor was I ever consulted, so I don't know how people normally run it. They don't even name it properly 🙃

1750199766810.png


BeanAnimal - Silent and Fail-Safe Overflow System
 
Last edited:
I was able to trim down the elbows with a saw. Now I have two elbows forming a 'U' inside the box for two of the drain pipes. Its a bit tight but i think it works.

See the pictures and let me know your thoughts.

WhatsApp Image 2025-06-18 at 10.10.31.jpeg
 
I was able to trim down the elbows with a saw. Now I have two elbows forming a 'U' inside the box for two of the drain pipes. Its a bit tight but i think it works.

See the pictures and let me know your thoughts.

WhatsApp Image 2025-06-18 at 10.10.31.jpeg
You dont need or want an elbow on the siphon "main" drain. There should be no reason for it and may interfere with operation. Water level should be set with the secondary drain so the siphon "main" drain stays submerged and as long as flow continues with in a certain amount will keep the water level above the main drain continuing its ability to keep a siphon.
 
Think Bean's explained it about three times, but with that distance between your primary and secondary drain height I suspect you need that elbow on the primary. Otherwise the water level needed to achieve full siphon without a vortex will be near your secondary drain level, possibly causing periodic breaks in the siphon and air sucking noise with variations in flow. Hard to tell in a photo though.

Make sure you have holes drilled in the tops of the elbows to allow air to escape as the box fills.
 
Think Bean's explained it about three times, but with that distance between your primary and secondary drain height I suspect you need that elbow on the primary. Otherwise the water level needed to achieve full siphon without a vortex will be near your secondary drain level, possibly causing periodic breaks in the siphon and air sucking noise with variations in flow. Hard to tell in a photo though.

Make sure you have holes drilled in the tops of the elbows to allow air to escape as the box fills.
Good points. The secondary drain may need to be a bit "taller". In this case that elbow may be needed. Most of my tanks are herbie style but one is Bean animal having an elbow on the siphon caused nothing but issues for me taking it off it worked as it should right away. My secondary drain on that tank is only maybe an inch below the emergency drain. I just used the pipes that came with the overflow box, 3 sizes and the emergency was red other two were black. Red one sits about an inch below the weir, secondary is maybe two inches below and the siphon is only maybe three inches long.
 
You dont need or want an elbow on the siphon "main" drain. There should be no reason for it and may interfere with operation.
Maybe somebody could ask the guy who designed the system 🙃


Water level should be set with the secondary drain so the siphon "main" drain stays submerged and as long as flow continues with in a certain amount will keep the water level above the main drain continuing its ability to keep a siphon.
That is not how the system works.
 
Bean animal having an elbow on the siphon caused nothing but issues for me taking it off it worked as it should right away.
adding the elbow setup likely caused the siphon standpipes weir height to be higher than the open channel. This will not work.

Also, the emergency can be raised higher if needed. It does not need to be below the weir height, but does need to be below the trim or true f,old height with enough headroom to kick in with the primary and secondary closed with the return pump running.

Lastly, depending on flow, the smaller standpipe would likely work as the siphon, leaving the larger pipes for secondary (quieter) and emergency.
 
adding the elbow setup likely caused the siphon standpipes weir height to be higher than the open channel. This will not work.

Also, the emergency can be raised higher if needed. It does not need to be below the weir height, but does need to be below the trim or true f,old height with enough headroom to kick in with the primary and secondary closed with the return pump running.

Lastly, depending on flow, the smaller standpipe would likely work as the siphon, leaving the larger pipes for secondary (quieter) and emergency.
I'm getting different opinions and I'm confused. To check if I'm following, raise the emergency pipe about an inch below the rim. The main drain (lowest one), one elbow, two elbows, no elbow? Lastly, for the secondary drain, one elbow, two elbows, or no elbow?
 
Hi Bean,

This is my current setup:

IMG_1561.jpeg



I tried doing this, but there was a lot of noise coming from the secondary:


IMG_1562.jpeg



In my system, the water level needs to be maintained just below the secondary drain to avoid activating it and generating excess noise.

What did I do wrong in the second picture ?
 
I'm getting different opinions and I'm confused. To check if I'm following, raise the emergency pipe about an inch below the rim. The main drain (lowest one), one elbow, two elbows, no elbow? Lastly, for the secondary drain, one elbow, two elbows, or no elbow?
The system (as designed) will work with the siphon (what people are calling the main) and the open channel (what people are calling the secondary) at the same height. Lowering the siphon can aid in it starting. However, the actual water level in the overflow box is adjusted by the flow rate of the siphon standpipe, not its height or the height of the open channel. The idea is to set the valve on the siphon standpipe to force a portion of the flow into the open channel. This is what keep the system balanced. If flow increases a bit, the open channel handles a bit more (as does the siphon due to increased head). If flow drops a bit, the flow slows in the open channel, and to an extend in the siphon due to decreased head. They interact with each other to autotune and prevent air from being sucked in or flow from backing up and flooding.

The reason for the elbows is explained above.

In short, an open top round standpipe under siphon will tend to form a vortex -- just like your sink or bathtub does when you fill it and drain it. An open top standpipe that is not submerged (the open channel) will simply tend to amplify sound coming out of it. The purpose of the elbows is to keep both intakes submerged in water where they can't form a vortex or amplify sound.
 
Hi Bean,

This is my current setup:

IMG_1561.jpeg



I tried doing this, but there was a lot of noise coming from the secondary:


IMG_1562.jpeg



In my system, the water level needs to be maintained just below the secondary drain to avoid activating it and generating excess noise.

What did I do wrong in the second picture ?
exactly
 
Thanks. I’ll try it again. Is this size of the hole important? Maybe it was too small when I did it a few years ago?
The size of the hole needs to be large enough to prevent a partial siphon from forming. 1/4" is fine.

The other key here is that the bottom of the standpipes are not submerged deep into the sump, or have air escape holes drilled just above the normal operating level of the sump. This allows the standpipe to operate without having to purge trapped air. Clearly an open top does not trap air 😀
 
Perfect!

I will go with this version from @Miami Reef and make a 1/4 inch hole on top and make sure it's not completely submerged in water. I will also make sure the pipes in the sump are no more than an inch deep.

Is this correct @BeanAnimal ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1562.jpeg
    IMG_1562.jpeg
    123.6 KB · Views: 25

TOP 10 Trending Threads

ARE YOU READY TO CONFESS TO CRAZIEST, DUMBEST, FUNNIEST THING YOU’VE EVER DONE IN REEFING?

  • Yeah, I'll confess! (Share your story in the comments!)

    Votes: 54 54.5%
  • Nah, I'll keep mine a secret...(Don't be like that, share with the class!)

    Votes: 45 45.5%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new