BM 150 pro versus SWC 160 cone.

  • Thread starter Thread starter davyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

davyr

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Location
Carlisle Cumbria (UK) Nr Lake District.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sorry to have to ask this question but i am currently running a bm 150 pro and to be honest i think there is to much turb in the chamber (even with the air dialled back),so i have been onto luke and i am in the process of deciding on importing a SWC 160 cone. Could any of you guys tell me which is the better of the two? Bearing in mind i live in the uk and i will have to import it. The SWC skimmers are not a well known skimmer in the uk and nobody stocks them so i need some unbiased advice please guys.
 
I would say the SWC 160 cone will be a slight upgrade. I own both SWC 160 and the BM180CS fyi. I love both and are great skimmers.
 

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 10 27.0%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 6 16.2%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 10 27.0%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 24.3%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 6 16.2%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 5.4%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 3 8.1%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 1 2.7%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new