BM 150 pro versus SWC 160 cone.

  • Thread starter Thread starter davyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

davyr

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Location
Carlisle Cumbria (UK) Nr Lake District.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sorry to have to ask this question but i am currently running a bm 150 pro and to be honest i think there is to much turb in the chamber (even with the air dialled back),so i have been onto luke and i am in the process of deciding on importing a SWC 160 cone. Could any of you guys tell me which is the better of the two? Bearing in mind i live in the uk and i will have to import it. The SWC skimmers are not a well known skimmer in the uk and nobody stocks them so i need some unbiased advice please guys.
 
I would say the SWC 160 cone will be a slight upgrade. I own both SWC 160 and the BM180CS fyi. I love both and are great skimmers.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT IS THE LOUDEST PART OF YOUR REEF SYSTEM?

  • Return pump

    Votes: 2 3.9%
  • Powerheads or wavemakers

    Votes: 2 3.9%
  • Protein skimmer

    Votes: 12 23.5%
  • Overflow or drain

    Votes: 13 25.5%
  • Sump vibration or plumbing

    Votes: 1 2.0%
  • Cooling fans

    Votes: 8 15.7%
  • Dosing, ATO, or other equipment

    Votes: 2 3.9%
  • Nothing. My reef is surprisingly quiet

    Votes: 8 15.7%
  • Other (Tell us what makes the noise)

    Votes: 3 5.9%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new