Would you be able to reword your question- I'm not entirely sure I understand, but I'll take a crack at it- correct me if I'm answering a question you weren't asking!
1) Yes, any coral that I perform testing on goes into dedicated tanks following treatment. This is both for observation and to prevent the spread of BJD to the other corals.
2) I assume by bacteria, you are referring to any bacteria associated with BJD? If so, it's a great question and one I can't answer! It's unknown what the causative agent is, but assuming it were some type of bacteria, it's still unknown whether BJD represents a specific type of bacterial infection secondary to a reduced host immune response or some other mechanism. The idea of reduced immunity is slightly complicated by the observations of how communicable the disease seems to be to otherwise healthy coral, although it is possible to explain this finding via a "the dose makes the poison" type of mechanism. As to your larger question, removal of the infected specimens seems to be the best treatment strategy and mitigates further spread of the disease.
1) Yes, any coral that I perform testing on goes into dedicated tanks following treatment. This is both for observation and to prevent the spread of BJD to the other corals.
2) I assume by bacteria, you are referring to any bacteria associated with BJD? If so, it's a great question and one I can't answer! It's unknown what the causative agent is, but assuming it were some type of bacteria, it's still unknown whether BJD represents a specific type of bacterial infection secondary to a reduced host immune response or some other mechanism. The idea of reduced immunity is slightly complicated by the observations of how communicable the disease seems to be to otherwise healthy coral, although it is possible to explain this finding via a "the dose makes the poison" type of mechanism. As to your larger question, removal of the infected specimens seems to be the best treatment strategy and mitigates further spread of the disease.

