Carbon vs. No Carbon

  • Thread starter Thread starter MysticSea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
there is something good that carbon absorb?

I mentioned that the binding of metals bound to organics could be a pro or a con. Those metals can include trace elements you may want. I don’t think that is a reason to avoid GAC however.

I am not aware of any actual organic materials that one doesn’t want bound, unless you are adding medications to the water. I don’t think vitamins added to the water are needed, but some vitamins may bind as well.
 
Is it true that carbon causes HITH/HLLE ? I come from fresh where carbon is considered a major culprit of HITH for large cichlids (oscars primarily) and I am seeing it come up with tangs in salt. Any thoughts on this?
I believe the main culprit there is if it is not THOROUGHLY rinsed first! The residual dust can be a problem in the HLLE department. At least this is what I have read.
 
I use it 24/7. I believe it definitely helps with water clarity, and cloar chemical warfare. I try to change it every 2 weeks minimum.
 

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 6 33.3%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 5 27.8%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 1 5.6%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new