I interpreted what he said as being directed at SharkLaser.I'm not a troll and gave you my opinion. Name calling doesn't help your cause.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I interpreted what he said as being directed at SharkLaser.I'm not a troll and gave you my opinion. Name calling doesn't help your cause.
I think I understand the original intent by the OP. When an opinion is requested and something is provided in return (in this case nothing of real value, just a contest entry) it creates a certain air of bias. It is enough of a problem that Amazon doesn’t allow it anymore (https://blog.aboutamazon.com/innovation/update-on-customer-reviews).There's plenty of great and bad reviews for Hannah and there products. I seriously don't see the point or good in this thread.
No, it's not biased. There was an attempt to have a DIY thread on here to help the community analyze Apex protocol for interoperability purposes with other devices. This thread was shut down (disabled and moved to admin forum) very swiftly and I highly suspect that Neptune management was directly involved.Really now, I find that biased. Any proof to back that up? R2R favors it's users IMO.
Good grief. R2R is for there members, we can disagree.No, it's not biased. There was an attempt to have a DIY thread on here to help the community analyze Apex protocol for interoperability purposes with other devices. This thread was shut down (disabled and moved to admin forum) very swiftly and I highly suspect that Neptune management was directly involved.
thats part of my point. there are many third party outlets for unbiased reviews. case in point, the contest made no mention of posts having to be positive on the retail sites that carry their product.There's plenty of great and bad reviews for Hannah and there products. I seriously don't see the point or good in this thread.
that is what I figured but there are business out there who will 'hide' bad reviews and push those customers away.
Good grief. R2R is for there members, we can disagree.
Very well said.I’ve found the moderation group to be thoughtful in their consideration of such things. I’ve not personally seen any instances of overt preference one way or another in my 6 years here but things seem to lean towards members as a fallback in ambiguous cases IMO. There is a line to be walked for sure! I’m confident it is being done fairly.
Hey everyone. Maybe its just me but isn't there something untoward to providing someone an entry to a contest for providing a "positive review"? Now I'm a big fan of certain Hanna products that I use so this isn't an issue I have with the product, but I think its just not right that they would provide contest entries for providing positive reviews which would make unbiased reviews less visible to prospective customers...
Am I wrong? Should R2R be supporting this type of contest?
PS. You can consider this an unbiased positive review for the ultra low range phosphate checker and alkalinity tester as I am independent having not entered the contest I would, however, caution about reviews you might find elsewhere online...
Well, R2R has a history of favoring sponsors over users.
No, it's not biased. There was an attempt to have a DIY thread on here to help the community analyze Apex protocol for interoperability purposes with other devices. This thread was shut down (disabled and moved to admin forum) very swiftly and I highly suspect that Neptune management was directly involved.
Well, you could then put yourself in that position by allowing the discussion of vinegar/vodka ratio in Red Sea Nopox product.The thread that was removed was talking about reverse engineering various Apex modules. We're not going to put ourselves in a position to be legally liable.
Well, you could then put yourself in that position by allowing the discussion of vinegar/vodka ratio in Red Sea Nopox product.
In the meantime, I would urge you to consider reading Electronic Frontier Foundation's advisory on reverse engineering, specifically for interoperability purposes and DMCA exceptions:
https://www.***.org/issues/coders/reverse-engineering-faq#faq9
Keywords to pay attention to would be "fair use doctrine" and "interoperability"
Edit: Too bad the link is not showing up.
Hey everyone. Maybe its just me but isn't there something untoward to providing someone an entry to a contest for providing a "positive review"? Now I'm a big fan of certain Hanna products that I use so this isn't an issue I have with the product, but I think its just not right that they would provide contest entries for providing positive reviews which would make unbiased reviews less visible to prospective customers...
Am I wrong? Should R2R be supporting this type of contest?
PS. You can consider this an unbiased positive review for the ultra low range phosphate checker and alkalinity tester as I am independent having not entered the contest I would, however, caution about reviews you might find elsewhere online...