Doubling up on a single chamber CA reactor....

  • Thread starter Thread starter tzsetzse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

tzsetzse

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
59
Reaction score
14
Location
Keyser WV
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been reading some interesting articles regarding single stage CA reactors as not adequately supplementing calcium but rather as a primary boost to dKH?!

So I'm wondering about my Knop C reactor. I'd like to figure out a method whereby I would not have to run a separate kalk drip but add another chamber for kalkwasser.

Would it be practical to run the effluent from the Knop directly into a super-saturated cylinder of kalkwasser, then emptying into the sump?

Anyone with any experience with this, please feel free to comment. I've ran kalk and I've run CA reactors but never both at the same time.

Thx!

Don
 
Seems like more trouble than it would be worth, assuming there was a theoretical amount of co2 that could stilll prevent calcium carbonate (chalk) formation.

My kalk is tied in with my ATO (automated) via a Tunze 5074 reactor. Have you tried anything like this?

-Matt
 
Well, not having an ATO, I was venturing down another path. However, it deserves merit....
 
I'd most certainly add an ATO + kalk reactor (Tunze sells a whole kit to this effect) before trying the combining maneuver. But that's me. ;)

Again, your "dual reactor" could work (IANAChemist) but I can only imagine the co2 balancing act you'd be playing. If you're mostly in it for the DIY and the experimentation, then definitely try it out! Fail = Chalk, which may not be a huge deal in your case. Definitely check out the article I linked in my "favorite links" sticky in the Chemistry section titled "kalkwasser" that goes into the specific kalkwasser/CO2 chemistry you'll be dealing with.

-Matt
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW IMPORTANT ARE FISH TO MAKING A REEF TANK FEEL COMPLETE?

  • Essential! A reef needs fish movement and personality

    Votes: 17 58.6%
  • Very important, but one or two fish may be enough

    Votes: 4 13.8%
  • Optional... a coral-only reef can feel completely finished

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • I actually prefer a coral-and-invertebrate-only system

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends on the tank’s size, style, or purpose

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • I’ve kept a fishless reef (details in the comments)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Well...it's complicated... (answer in the comments)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new