- Joined
- Nov 13, 2019
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 18
hi,
i have 2 optical level sensor setup in my sump for ATO/AWC. The auto water change involves first draining out water until bottom sensor is reached then refilling with fresh saltwater back up to the top sensor. When bottom sensor fails to recognize dry state, tank water would be drained pass the bottom sensor and return pump would run dry. Luckily I used a autoaqua smart ac outlet to shut off the drain pump before this happens. I suspect due to the bottom optical sensor being submerged in saltwater all the time, it's more prone to fail. I've had to replaced the bottom optical sensor about 3 times already, each lasting about 1 year.
question:
1. would float sensor be more reliable to use as the bottom sensor ?
2. Without using third party device like autoaqua smart ac outlet, how can I use extra optical/float sensors for redundancy in GHL so that when the bottom sensor fails to recognize dry state another sensor can prevent the drain pump from draining the sump dry ?
i have 2 optical level sensor setup in my sump for ATO/AWC. The auto water change involves first draining out water until bottom sensor is reached then refilling with fresh saltwater back up to the top sensor. When bottom sensor fails to recognize dry state, tank water would be drained pass the bottom sensor and return pump would run dry. Luckily I used a autoaqua smart ac outlet to shut off the drain pump before this happens. I suspect due to the bottom optical sensor being submerged in saltwater all the time, it's more prone to fail. I've had to replaced the bottom optical sensor about 3 times already, each lasting about 1 year.
question:
1. would float sensor be more reliable to use as the bottom sensor ?
2. Without using third party device like autoaqua smart ac outlet, how can I use extra optical/float sensors for redundancy in GHL so that when the bottom sensor fails to recognize dry state another sensor can prevent the drain pump from draining the sump dry ?
