There is no possible way ammonia factors here
its also untrue that if we dont stagger fish additions, ammonia might be uncontrolled. Not the case.
a reef tank carries the full number of fish it can carry nh3 wise after the cycle, it doesn’t get stronger over time. Cycled is cycled. Surfaces are not missing bacteria awaiting more fish to pack more bac
if there’s water the bac seat in place fully
We have to add more surface area to handle more fish if we break the limits, we can’t pack more bacteria on to existing surfaces as that lowers surface area if we did and tank currents don’t permit it anyway. Just because someone adds more Dr Tim’s right now to a running reef doesn’t mean it goes right to the rocks and produces and even more able cycle, thats not true.
it will be sinked and skimmed off as aggregate, the rocks self manage their own colonies because there’s water and feed present, even without fish.
when folks add fish back to a fallowed tank, they don’t get a mini cycle.
humans are not controlling water bac with their every whim, this is only a forum claim.
disease is the issue here. Not that anyone will agree lol but we have enough surface area studies on file can link an example for any claim made, and if you post the issue in this forum ammonia won’t be factored either:
https://www.reef2reef.com/forums/fish-disease-treatment-and-diagnosis.771/
missing from that forum: any links of tanks fixed by non quarantine advocates. It’s always their own tank that is the focus, but above you can see work involving others tanks.
notice what is being used for years, pages there.
**of course several folks posting here don’t fallow / QT and have top reefs, communication of that ability is the challenge.
it takes orders steps as shown in the fish disease to get statistically significant patterns. If that’s an untrue statement we will soon see a no quarantine link with half as many fixes.
that doesn’t mean QT is best or fixes anything best, it means the only ordered and patterned work threads you can find using others tanks are in that forum. Non qt advocates have their own tanks as proof, that forum uses others tanks for patterning and the bar is much higher for logged participation there.
by having ones own tank as the example, all disclosures are controlled and subject to reporting bias and sheer artistic skill which doesn’t list very well as ordered steps.
qt has ordered steps and timing however, we can see.
by having four hundred random reefers evaluate a given claim, you get to see what patterns become evident. Qt and fallow comprises all the threads in stickies in the disease forum, zoos use the method.
you can firmly rule out ammonia.
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/suddenly-add-20-fish-to-established-tank.806557/#post-8622731