ICP test results back

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
24509254-147E-495E-B808-DE94EE54C37C.jpeg
I received my results back today on my water test. Everything looks good to me except for Chlorine, Sulfur and silicon. Does anyone see any other problems and how do address these problems. I use a ro/di unit for my ato water. So not sure where it’s coming from. Any suggestions is greatly appreciated. Thank you
 

DLHDesign

Ex-Noob
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
3,259
Reaction score
4,935
Location
Lathrop, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are you running carbon blocks on your RO/DI? How new are the rest of your filters, membranes, and resin?
Have you ever seen a water report for your area to get a sense of what your source water might be?
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I do not have carbon blocks on my ro/di but I run carbon in my sump in a lifegard reactor. I bought one of the ro/di units but I received a tds meter yesterday and it reads 0. I also just got a water report about a week ago. I looked over it but I need to find it and look again. I’ve only had the ro unit up and running for about 4 months but maybe I should invest in one made to remove chloramines after watching a brs video. Thank you for your insight.
 

DLHDesign

Ex-Noob
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
3,259
Reaction score
4,935
Location
Lathrop, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I do not have carbon blocks on my ro/di
That's most likely why you have such high numbers of those contaminates - it's the carbon block that mostly removes those. Absolutely recommend adding that to your RO/DI setup (along with sediment filters to help protect the carbon filter/RO membrane if you don't already have that).
 

madweazl

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
5,055
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You actually have very few things high and most things quite low, potassium for instance. I double checked your ICP results using this calculator because a lot of things looked quite low; your salinity works out to 30.82.
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's most likely why you have such high numbers of those contaminates - it's the carbon block that mostly removes those. Absolutely recommend adding that to your RO/DI setup (along with sediment filters to help protect the carbon filter/RO membrane if you don't already have that).
I ordered a new unit today that has carbon blocks and says it removes silicates and chlorine. So hoping that will help along with the sea hem prime I bought to take out the chlorine. Thank you for your hrlp
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You actually have very few things high and most things quite low, potassium for instance. I double checked your ICP results using this calculator because a lot of things looked quite low; your salinity works out to 30.82.
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It has salinity at the top right corner that I converted to 1.0255 which is right where I need to be as far as I know. I’ve been checking the main things that I know to check like ca, alk, phos, nitrates and all seem to be pretty good but I will look into these other elements once I’m ready to try corals again. I had some sps bleach out on me and I’m thinking among other things it was probably the chlorine and maybe silicates. Thankyou for your suggestions. I very much appreciate everyone on this forum.
 

madweazl

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
5,055
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It has salinity at the top right corner that I converted to 1.0255 which is right where I need to be as far as I know. I’ve been checking the main things that I know to check like ca, alk, phos, nitrates and all seem to be pretty good but I will look into these other elements once I’m ready to try corals again. I had some sps bleach out on me and I’m thinking among other things it was probably the chlorine and maybe silicates. Thankyou for your suggestions. I very much appreciate everyone on this forum.

I understand what it shows at the top but the element levels indicate something different. The chlorine levels (which should actually be chloride I believe) are below reference levels for ATI and Triton (both of which have better reputations than icp-analysis.com for accuracy). If you were having trouble with corals, it looks to me like you're deficient in at least half of macro elements and most of micro and trace elements. With that said, I'm not sure I'd trust any of the results you got from that analysis.
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I understand what it shows at the top but the element levels indicate something different. The chlorine levels (which should actually be chloride I believe) are below reference levels for ATI and Triton (both of which have better reputations than icp-analysis.com for accuracy). If you were having trouble with corals, it looks to me like you're deficient in at least half of macro elements and most of micro and trace elements. With that said, I'm not sure I'd trust any of the results you got from that analysis.
Oh ok. I understand what you are saying now. So ati and triton are better. Maybe I’ll give one of those a try. It would help to have a comparison. Thanks
 

madweazl

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
5,055
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A few decent sized water changes would likely serve you better than another ICP. I would have whatever device you're measuring salinity with, checked or calibrated and measured against a different device to eliminate salinity as an issue first.
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A few decent sized water changes would likely serve you better than another ICP. I would have whatever device you're measuring salinity with, checked or calibrated and measured against a different device to eliminate salinity as an issue first.
I’m using a Hannah salinity checker calibrated with the solution. It shows 1.025. I have a refractometer that I haven’t used in awhile because I don’t believe it’s as accurate. I will get it out and try it though.
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Now I’m more confused. Hannah checker says 1.023 and refractometer says 1.025 both after using calibration solution.
 

madweazl

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
5,055
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Now I’m more confused. Hannah checker says 1.023 and refractometer says 1.025 both after using calibration solution.

Are you using a calibration fluid with the correct refractive index for the refractometer?
 
OP
OP
Jdubs

Jdubs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’m not sure about that. I can’t find anything in the manual for it. The bottle has it on it but nothing in the manual about refractive index. The Hanna checker came with its brand solution so I’m thinking it’s right. It’s showing it low at 1.023
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 26.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 34.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.5%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.8%
Back
Top