- Joined
- May 19, 2017
- Messages
- 631
- Reaction score
- 434
I am trying to decide if it is worth the trouble to build a water mixing station for the system I am working on. I don't think I would be happy rolling brute cans around on a regular basis but I also don't want to waste my time on something that just collects dust sitting unused.
I was watching some of the BRS videos on the topic and their comments on the BRS160 transition got me thinking about this. Realistically, for a new system starting with the Triton method from the get go, what frequency would it be expected to need water changes? Monthly, quarterly, yearly? Assuming that minimum Triton method recommendations are met, what size changes would be typical?
Anyone running the Triton method able to share experience on the usefulness of a mixing station? And what size? i.e. 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 100% of system volume? Curious if it is something that would only make the initial fill simpler or it would be generally useful long term?
I was watching some of the BRS videos on the topic and their comments on the BRS160 transition got me thinking about this. Realistically, for a new system starting with the Triton method from the get go, what frequency would it be expected to need water changes? Monthly, quarterly, yearly? Assuming that minimum Triton method recommendations are met, what size changes would be typical?
Anyone running the Triton method able to share experience on the usefulness of a mixing station? And what size? i.e. 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 100% of system volume? Curious if it is something that would only make the initial fill simpler or it would be generally useful long term?