Is the difference worth it?

R.moore80

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
60
Reaction score
35
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMG_0114.JPG
IMG_0111.JPG


One is a "pro" model and is 80$ more than the other light? Is it that much better does anyone have this light? It's for my 10 gallon nano.
 

Kevinsreefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
101
Reaction score
65
Location
Rochester/Binghamton, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
neither is worth it IMO there is much better options on there.
I agree, much better options if that's the budget you're looking to spend on lights. SB Reef Lights or MarsAqua lights (Chinese sh*tboxes) are pretty decent lights for the price!!
 

azreeftank

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
218
Reaction score
348
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What size tank you using it in? If you are getting one of the two Def get the Pro it is MUCH better than the other. I have the Pro on my 65 mixed reef and getting good growth. Again for the money it's fine if your not looking to spend $$$$.
 
OP
OP
R

R.moore80

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
60
Reaction score
35
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So my tank is only 10 gallons, 20 inches from end to end and I can't hang anything it has to mount to my rimmed tank

Okay okay so I found this



Not sure what any of that means.. but I'd it better than the base model USA light I mentioned earlier?
 

Frop

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
1,064
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMG_0114.JPG
IMG_0111.JPG


One is a "pro" model and is 80$ more than the other light? Is it that much better does anyone have this light? It's for my 10 gallon nano.

Is it a fish only tank or are you adding coral?

The Chinese box Can put out some serious light... it's good for the price. This is when I bought one for my 10 gallon. I hated the spotlighting so I returned it and just spent more to get the Hydra. I figured I'd upgrade my tank in the future anyways.

If you are looking for a light imo you should search the reviews or Q/A for some kind of par values. I'm saying that because if you're going to spend $100+ might as well get a light you know is capable of delivering enough light.

IMG_1983.JPG
 
OP
OP
R

R.moore80

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
60
Reaction score
35
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I already have a zoa, Goni, and I believe it's called a "sun coral" frag I put my finnex planted 24 on just to see the difference and my zoas just opened for the first time.. so a light is definitely something I want asap but 150$ is my ballpark budget
What par do corals need 0.o
 

Kevinsreefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
101
Reaction score
65
Location
Rochester/Binghamton, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I already have a zoa, Goni, and I believe it's called a "sun coral" frag I put my finnex planted 24 on just to see the difference and my zoas just opened for the first time.. so a light is definitely something I want asap but 150$ is my ballpark budget
What par do corals need 0.o

It all depends on what kind of coral. For a general and quick rundown there are 4 main types and like I said this is skimming the very very top (no pun intended).

NPS (Non photosynthetic): Sun corals, gorgonians etc. These don't have photosynthetic algae/bacteria living within them so they must eat particles to survive.

Soft Corals: mushrooms, GSP, zoas, leathers.
These will be your low range light corals where they require the least demanding of lights. Some people even grow them under fluorescent bulbs (not recommended). Typically on the bottom half of the tank

LPS: Euphyllia, Acans, hard skeleton with fleshy meat.
These will require moderate light but dependent on the lighting system you use. Mid to upper part of the tank.

SPS: Montis, acros, anything that looks like hard deer antler shaped corals.
These will be the most demanding when it comes to lights and water parameters (for the most part) and will usually be situated in high light and high flow.

Like I said, this is a VERY VERY basic overview. It's best to start corals off with a lower amount of light and slowly acclimate them to a higher/more intense light. Flow and water parameters are also key so it's not just about lighting. However, lighting plays a big role.
 

Kevinsreefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
101
Reaction score
65
Location
Rochester/Binghamton, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I already have a zoa, Goni, and I believe it's called a "sun coral" frag I put my finnex planted 24 on just to see the difference and my zoas just opened for the first time.. so a light is definitely something I want asap but 150$ is my ballpark budget
What par do corals need 0.o

Also, there isn't a DEFINITIVE amount of lights each coral will need. Each system is different as well as each coral so it's hard to put a label on the exact PAR. Maybe someone else can help out? I haven't ever tested PAR, instead put the coral generally where you think it will be happy, it will let you know. Move it around a little!
 

Kevinsreefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
101
Reaction score
65
Location
Rochester/Binghamton, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's the best description I've had yet! I'm definitely intrigued by soft ant LPS

Like I said, I barely scratched the surface. A lot of other variables come into play! For example I have low light mushrooms that hypothetically should be in (you guessed it...) low light! But I have them at the top of my tank where SPS are located because I didn't have room for the mushroom colony in the lower half of the tank. Within a few weeks, I slowly acclimated them to higher lighting and they are doing great!

So just to reiterate, corals can acclimate to different parameters as long as they aren't too crazy and as long as it's done slowly!

(Now that doesn't mean try to acclimate SPS to the bottom end of the tank where they have no light) but you get what I mean!

Here are those mushrooms (Yuma's) in case you guys were wondering!

IMG_3218.JPG
 

Leadfooted

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
2,135
Reaction score
3,118
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
IMG_0114.JPG
IMG_0111.JPG


One is a "pro" model and is 80$ more than the other light? Is it that much better does anyone have this light? It's for my 10 gallon nano.

For what it's worth, I started with the Orbit (not pro) in my 90g. I do with I got the pro to start because of the red's they have. My regular orbit does great for hammers, acan/micormussa, blasto's, shrooms, star polyps and towards to top I managed to grow a very nice acro that's getting good current. Ive since added 2 t5's but for a start, the orbit preformed pretty dang good for a few years for me.

The only Downside I always had was the custom settings that always reset (frustrating). I finally gave up and just use the reef pre-set setting and my corals adjusted just fine.
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,625
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMG_0114.JPG
IMG_0111.JPG


One is a "pro" model and is 80$ more than the other light? Is it that much better does anyone have this light? It's for my 10 gallon nano.
IMO, that add is misleading. when doing my search on them some used "pro" to describe the Pro controller, some are referring to the led head. The Pro head should have lenses(circles on the led) the standard wont(squre led)
Buy the cheaper one Its a very good light, esp for a shallower thank. It has plenty of par. The par specs listed are very close to real life meter readings..

The difficulty most have had with theses light is is the non lense don't penetrate deeply..
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reaction score
8,968
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Buy the cheaper one Its a very good light, esp for a shallower thank. It has plenty of par. The par specs listed are very close to real life meter readings..

The difficulty most have had with theses light is is the non lense don't penetrate deeply..

+1

(sorry I missed that this was for a 10G!)
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 34.2%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 10 8.3%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.7%
Back
Top