- Joined
- Mar 2, 2019
- Messages
- 893
- Reaction score
- 1,262
It's tough to determine minimum tank requirements. Those things vary, and more and more, I think the tank size is only one variable to consider and may not be as big of a factor as some people think.
I'd second this. There are cases where even 6 foot long tanks are really too small for really actively-swimming fish such as the pomacanthus angels and larger tangs because the tank's so crowded with rock there's little or no swimming room. In tanks aquascaped this way, smaller active fish that can easily swim through the rock work such as wrasses might be more appropriate.
Conversely, keeping fairly large, actively swimming fish in a minimalist aquascape might not be so good either, depending on how "minimalist" it is. Most vertebrate animals that we keep as pets, including fish, need stimulation in some form or another to avoid developing behavioral problems. In the case of fish, one of the most common behavioral problems that's easy to observe is "pacing" - swimming the exact same path through the tank constantly throughout the day. IMO, keeping a reef-dwelling fish in even a quite large tank that has very little in the way of structure to excite the fish's instinct to browse is inviting behavioral issues.
I think this is a subject that has rather clear outliers that most would agree is good/not good, and a whole lot of gray area in the middle. I'd guess most of us would not want to see a Sohal tang in a 3 foot long tank, and most of us would say a 12 foot long, 6 foot wide reef tank at a commercial aquarium might be appropriate.