Issue

OP
OP
Perthegallon

Perthegallon

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2020
Messages
1,926
Reaction score
727
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
hummmmmmm??
Sorry should have attached this I must have not waited for the upload

3ACFA738-FB82-4913-AF60-29611995C018.jpeg
 

piranhaman00

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
4,875
Reaction score
4,827
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thats high but not dangerous, how are the inhabitants looking?

Water changes never hurt if done correctly :)
 

TheHarold

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
5,145
Reaction score
8,758
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A descriptive title is always helpful, such as: “Is .4ppm phosphate an issue?”. That lets people who are knowledgeable about the subject respond.

Water changes never hurt, ideally would be closer to .1. I suppose it depends whether you have basic soft corals and fish, or want to keep acropora etc.
 
OP
OP
Perthegallon

Perthegallon

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2020
Messages
1,926
Reaction score
727
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thats high but not dangerous, how are the inhabitants looking?

Water changes never hurt if done correctly :)
They are fine no one seems to have a issue nitrates are so low I just don’t want to do a water change
 

NS Mike D

In the arena.
View Badges
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
4,795
Location
Huntington. NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
a 10% water change is going to result in PO4 at 0.36 so keep that in mind.


If NO3 is absent, that might limit the uptake in PO4 since coral/cheato growth needs both.



GFO is very effective in reducing PO4 without throwing off other numbers, but go easy and slow as bottoming out PO4 can result in bigger problems
 
OP
OP
Perthegallon

Perthegallon

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2020
Messages
1,926
Reaction score
727
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
a 10% water change is going to result in PO4 at 0.36 so keep that in mind.


If NO3 is absent, that might limit the uptake in PO4 since coral/cheato growth needs both.



GFO is very effective in reducing PO4 without throwing off other numbers, but go easy and slow as bottoming out PO4 can result in bigger problems
Could it be I took this two seconds after I was feeding
 

NS Mike D

In the arena.
View Badges
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
4,795
Location
Huntington. NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Could it be I took this two seconds after I was feeding

I am not a chemist or biologist, but from what know there are many ways to introduce phosphates into an aquarium so feeding would be be linked to decaying uneaten fish food or fish feces. Neither could be processed that quickly.

As for testing, I believe testing as the same time would result in more reliable numbers as trend is often just as important as are the individual absolute numbers. Testing at the same time eliminates any intraday swings. Although I find NO3 and PO4 to test fairly consistent throughout the course of a day.
 

Fusion in reefing: How do you feel about grafted corals?

  • I strongly prefer grafted corals and I seek them out to put in my tank.

    Votes: 3 4.1%
  • I find grafted corals appealing and would be open to having them in my tank.

    Votes: 43 58.1%
  • I am indifferent about grafted corals and am not enthusiastic about having them in my tank.

    Votes: 21 28.4%
  • I have reservations about grafted corals and would generally avoid having them in my tank.

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • I have a negative perception and would avoid having grafted corals in my tank.

    Votes: 2 2.7%
Back
Top