I watched the full video, and am impressed with the amount of effort BRS put into testing. That was a lot of work, and the Li-Cor meter and 3 underwater sensors don't come cheap! Good job BRS! My comments: The PAR measurements are probably a tad low due to the UV LEDs (which *most* quantum meters/sensors can't 'see' but are still PAR.) The spectrum adjustment is more of a marketing tool, I think (it keeps the significant other happy when the light is adjusted to what is considered the 'perfect spectral output' but it make the carpet look purple, so negotiation is necessary.) But the only way to know for sure is looking at the electron transport rate. Anything else is just speculation. It is certain that this Kessil is capable of producing enough light to satisfy just about any photosynthetic invertebrate if due diligence is given to lamp positioning and consideration of tank size. I was told by a owner of a large commercial coral farm that they ran Kessils on their tanks and the corals received PAR of 25. Yup, I said 25. Just a couple of pet peeves - I don't like fan-cooled luminaires. Fans fail, and when working they draw salt spray across the electronics. And please - Saying that SPS corals (Acroporas) require more light than soft corals just isn't true. 'Myth-information' is what Ron Shimek called it. And speaking of Rons - was that Ronny Schopke doing the spectral analysis?@Dana Riddle
Did you quote the "cut sheet" or have you taken the time to watch and disgest the above BRS video?
If you watched the video. What is your overall take on the Kessil a360's par / uv and kessil logic?
Thanks, Freddie