Large refugium or large skimmer

mccune

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
82
Reaction score
87
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been running my Cadlights 50 long with sump for a year now. I am planning on plumbing in a 30 gallon shallow tank as well. While planning this upgrade I am debating upgrading to a larger skimmer or plumbing in a biocube 29 or 55 gallon tank as a refugium. I don’t know what is going to give me the best filtration.
Right now I’m running an eshopps 120x for a skimmer and more live rock in the sump.

The Cadlights 50 will be a SPS dominated system

The shallow tank will be a zoa and lps tank.

Let me know what you think or you are currently running on your system.

For a larger skimmer I have a Reef Octupus Elite 200 sss which I could use but may be way overkill.
 

MaiReef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
1,140
Location
Albany, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMHO your Eshopps skimmer is plenty big even for a heavy load for a 50 gallon so adding the 30 would be okay, but I like a nice balance with a fug and skimmer. However, I run a Curve 5 and have a 12x12 refugium in a 30 gallon tank for a 100 gallon display.
 

Swoody

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Messages
798
Reaction score
1,148
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Y
I have been running my Cadlights 50 long with sump for a year now. I am planning on plumbing in a 30 gallon shallow tank as well. While planning this upgrade I am debating upgrading to a larger skimmer or plumbing in a biocube 29 or 55 gallon tank as a refugium. I don’t know what is going to give me the best filtration.
Right now I’m running an eshopps 120x for a skimmer and more live rock in the sump.

The Cadlights 50 will be a SPS dominated system

The shallow tank will be a zoa and lps tank.

Let me know what you think or you are currently running on your system.

For a larger skimmer I have a Reef Octupus Elite 200 sss which I could use but may be way overkill.

You can still use that skimmer and it would be perfect...just put it on a timer and you are good to go!
 
OP
OP
mccune

mccune

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
82
Reaction score
87
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Would I be better off with a 55 gallon fuge or an old biocube that has the false wall cut out
 

MaiReef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
1,140
Location
Albany, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Would I be better off with a 55 gallon fuge or an old biocube that has the false wall cut out

a 55 gallon used only for a refugium would work really well for your drain, skimmer, refugium and return pump, but I would glue in baffles with sections and a bubble trap.
 

Smarkow

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
1,214
Reaction score
2,378
Location
Toledo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
431F57BE-BC54-4255-A364-143FF1F646A3.jpeg

Big Fuges provide a ton of stability. In expert studies, skimmers do not export a ton of "nutrients" (see advanced aquarist 2010 articles below).

"The bottom line, however, is that the skimmate liquid contains mostly the common inorganic ions that constitute the major ions in seawater. Only a small amount of this material can be arguably assigned to dissolved organic carbon, DOC." https://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/2/aafeature
Additionally, there is virtually no nitrate or phosphate in the Skimmate (as stated elsewhere in the article).

"None of the skimmers tested removed more than 35% of the extant TOC, leading to the conclusion that bubbles are really not a very effective medium for organic nutrient removal." https://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature

I have been running 2 years without skimmer using a 75 gallon under display fuge with 2x kessil h380's. I think the role of a skimmer should be in a space limited tank, or for gas exchange or ozone injection (I don't run ozone either), alternatively someone running zeovit or biopellets who wants to export bacteria may have need for a skimmer? A bag of carbon for water clarity is likely superior to skimming.

Good luck :)
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.2%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.2%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.6%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.8%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.2%
Back
Top