Lessons learned in trying to maintain pH stability

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For those interested in maintaining pH stability around +/- 0.05 I have a couple of lessons learned. These are things that I found out on my journey to pH stability.
  • Prior to seeking pH stability my tank pH was consistently around ~7.9. However, much of this journey went on before the tank was mature with lots of photosynthetic organisms. I have no doubt that had I just waited, daytime and nighttime pH (with a refugium) would have been higher.
  • It's possible to maintain pH stability around +/- 0.05. My setup is Kalkwasser, reverse light-cycle Refugium, oversized skimmer with recirculating CO2 scrubber, valve to switch between CO2 scrubbed air and indoor air, and controller.
  • A continuous kalkwasser drip was most effective and provided me with a pH boost of about ~0.12
  • Refugium took three tries to really get going and needs weekly trimming to maintain health and optimal benefits
  • If home air is between 600-800 my pH is easy to maintain. Below 600, my pH highs can go above 0.025 of my setpoint during the day period. Above 800 my lows can go below 0.025 of my setpoint.
  • An oversized skimmer was required to stabilize and control my pH (I have an Aeraqua Dou on a 100gal tank ~3X what I need). I believe this was needed to overcome the rest of the tank aeration from powerheads and return pumps.
  • My skimmer is only active to raise or lower pH and comes on for about 6-8 hours a day. Despite only using my skimmer for pH control, it still skims a ton (~1000ml a week)
  • Often figuring out why my pH would go out of alignment was a challenge and had me going down rabbit holes. Ultimately, it always came down to CO2 scrubber, Kalkwasses, and air CO2 levels. Typically lower lows was an indication of CO2 scrubber issue, lower average was a Kalkwasser issue, and higher highs was lower levels of air CO2 due to good weather and open windows and doors.
  • Figuring out when the CO2 media is exhausted was trial and error. I eventually figured out lower lows indicated something was up with my CO2 scrubber. I'm getting roughly 1 month of CO2 scrubbing from my media (6 cups). I use the BRS DUO Jumbo CO2 Scrubber which has 2x 6-cup capacity media holders. I use this setup to maximize the life of the media. Basically monthly I take the 2nd stage cartridge and move it to the 1st stage and add a fresh cartridge to the 2nd stage. This ensures I get the maximum life by fully exhausting the media. I use a similar trick for the di phase of my RODI system.
  • Recirculating air tubing can fill with condensation and impact airflow. You want to make sure your tubing doesn't have any dip to collect the water.
  • Typical CO2 scrubber issues included exhausted CO2 media, clogged airline, no moisture for the media (had this before recirculation), too much water in the media cartridges (before the Jumbo setup) , issue with skimmer performance
  • Typical kalkwasser issues included unsaturated kalk (measured with EC meter) due to bar stirrer (switched to a magnetic stirrer), unsaturated kalk due to much kalk in reactor not allowing the magnetic stirrer to stir or too little kalk, and issues with reservoir running dry. Also caught a tube blockage...
  • Typical indoor CO2 level issues are when indoor air is low in CO2 (open windows) and I can't drive down the pH or when it's way high (lots of people or heating/cooking) and skimmer can't contribute as much. Interesting enough, when it's raining outside CO2 goes up in the house by a little bit.
  • Having the skimmer after the refugium was a mistake for me (at least with chaeto). I was typically cleaning out my skimmer every 6 weeks with just an acetic bath and always found performance went up afterwards as expected. I was having unexpected lower pH lows and thought there was something going on with the CO2 scrubbing...took forever to figure out, long story short, chaeto was getting in the needle wheel. I had to switch the refugium and skimmer locations in the sump.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,517
Reaction score
10,048
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bravo, you condensed maybe a year of fiddling, figuring, and tinkering into a 5 minute read. Nicely done, and thanks.
 

Righteous

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
812
Reaction score
1,060
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Any results on livestock health effects? I’m assuming your KH had to fluctuate a bit. Curious if the pH stability gave you more success than KH stability.
 
OP
OP
arking_mark

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Any results on livestock health effects? I’m assuming your KH had to fluctuate a bit. Curious if the pH stability gave you more success than KH stability.
pH stability helped with KH stability.

I'm not sure if there were any tangible benefits for the livestock yet.

I've had no ugly stage yet and the tank is about a year old. However, I attribute that to automating everything.

I'm no longer killing coral for the last handful of months..but they are not thriving yet either. I blame ULN for some of this. I've addressed this issue.

So I'm now in the grow-out stage. If everything takes off and thrives, I'm sure I'll attribute some of the success to pH stability.
 

shakacuz

hang loose, cuz
View Badges
Joined
Aug 7, 2021
Messages
8,696
Reaction score
33,500
Location
Eastern PA
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
bravo! will definitely look into these points if i ever encounter any issues. so far my pH remains stable, however i assume now for the winter it will change again since for most of the summer windows were left open to circulate air.
 
OP
OP
arking_mark

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Screenshot_20211110-005650_GHL Connect.jpg
 
OP
OP
arking_mark

arking_mark

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
1,820
Location
Potomac
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Extended highs, as the in-home air CO2 levels are between 400-500 with open windows during the day and only 2 of 4 people home. At these levels, my skimmer cannot significantly drive down the pH.


Screenshot_20211115-084321_GHL Connect.jpg
 

BiggestE22

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
130
Reaction score
59
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Extended highs, as the in-home air CO2 levels are between 400-500 with open windows during the day and only 2 of 4 people home. At these levels, my skimmer cannot significantly drive down the pH.


Screenshot_20211115-084321_GHL Connect.jpg
I dose Kalkwasser to exact level as evaporation. I have 2 CO2 scrubbers daisy chained. Stay at 8.2/8.4. Also run my Pax-Bellum Algae Reactor at night for 6 hours.
 

Attachments

  • E2E4A41B-3FC0-459C-A172-C0197E84AFC8.jpeg
    E2E4A41B-3FC0-459C-A172-C0197E84AFC8.jpeg
    173.8 KB · Views: 111

BiggestE22

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
130
Reaction score
59
Location
Dallas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For those interested in maintaining pH stability around +/- 0.05 I have a couple of lessons learned. These are things that I found out on my journey to pH stability.
  • Prior to seeking pH stability my tank pH was consistently around ~7.9. However, much of this journey went on before the tank was mature with lots of photosynthetic organisms. I have no doubt that had I just waited, daytime and nighttime pH (with a refugium) would have been higher.
  • It's possible to maintain pH stability around +/- 0.05. My setup is Kalkwasser, reverse light-cycle Refugium, oversized skimmer with recirculating CO2 scrubber, valve to switch between CO2 scrubbed air and indoor air, and controller.
  • A continuous kalkwasser drip was most effective and provided me with a pH boost of about ~0.12
  • Refugium took three tries to really get going and needs weekly trimming to maintain health and optimal benefits
  • If home air is between 600-800 my pH is easy to maintain. Below 600, my pH highs can go above 0.025 of my setpoint during the day period. Above 800 my lows can go below 0.025 of my setpoint.
  • An oversized skimmer was required to stabilize and control my pH (I have an Aeraqua Dou on a 100gal tank ~3X what I need). I believe this was needed to overcome the rest of the tank aeration from powerheads and return pumps.
  • My skimmer is only active to raise or lower pH and comes on for about 6-8 hours a day. Despite only using my skimmer for pH control, it still skims a ton (~1000ml a week)
  • Often figuring out why my pH would go out of alignment was a challenge and had me going down rabbit holes. Ultimately, it always came down to CO2 scrubber, Kalkwasses, and air CO2 levels. Typically lower lows was an indication of CO2 scrubber issue, lower average was a Kalkwasser issue, and higher highs was lower levels of air CO2 due to good weather and open windows and doors.
  • Figuring out when the CO2 media is exhausted was trial and error. I eventually figured out lower lows indicated something was up with my CO2 scrubber. I'm getting roughly 1 month of CO2 scrubbing from my media (6 cups). I use the BRS DUO Jumbo CO2 Scrubber which has 2x 6-cup capacity media holders. I use this setup to maximize the life of the media. Basically monthly I take the 2nd stage cartridge and move it to the 1st stage and add a fresh cartridge to the 2nd stage. This ensures I get the maximum life by fully exhausting the media. I use a similar trick for the di phase of my RODI system.
  • Recirculating air tubing can fill with condensation and impact airflow. You want to make sure your tubing doesn't have any dip to collect the water.
  • Typical CO2 scrubber issues included exhausted CO2 media, clogged airline, no moisture for the media (had this before recirculation), too much water in the media cartridges (before the Jumbo setup) , issue with skimmer performance
  • Typical kalkwasser issues included unsaturated kalk (measured with EC meter) due to bar stirrer (switched to a magnetic stirrer), unsaturated kalk due to much kalk in reactor not allowing the magnetic stirrer to stir or too little kalk, and issues with reservoir running dry. Also caught a tube blockage...
  • Typical indoor CO2 level issues are when indoor air is low in CO2 (open windows) and I can't drive down the pH or when it's way high (lots of people or heating/cooking) and skimmer can't contribute as much. Interesting enough, when it's raining outside CO2 goes up in the house by a little bit.
  • Having the skimmer after the refugium was a mistake for me (at least with chaeto). I was typically cleaning out my skimmer every 6 weeks with just an acetic bath and always found performance went up afterwards as expected. I was having unexpected lower pH lows and thought there was something going on with the CO2 scrubbing...took forever to figure out, long story short, chaeto was getting in the needle wheel. I had to switch the refugium and skimmer locations in the sump.
Also you should get a PH Monitor if you don’t have one
 

Attachments

  • AB8655E7-3354-4F4B-87AB-4FADA5FDE965.jpeg
    AB8655E7-3354-4F4B-87AB-4FADA5FDE965.jpeg
    84.8 KB · Views: 120

14 foot reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
2,195
Reaction score
3,527
Location
Apex NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For those interested in maintaining pH stability around +/- 0.05 I have a couple of lessons learned. These are things that I found out on my journey to pH stability.
  • Prior to seeking pH stability my tank pH was consistently around ~7.9. However, much of this journey went on before the tank was mature with lots of photosynthetic organisms. I have no doubt that had I just waited, daytime and nighttime pH (with a refugium) would have been higher.
  • It's possible to maintain pH stability around +/- 0.05. My setup is Kalkwasser, reverse light-cycle Refugium, oversized skimmer with recirculating CO2 scrubber, valve to switch between CO2 scrubbed air and indoor air, and controller.
  • A continuous kalkwasser drip was most effective and provided me with a pH boost of about ~0.12
  • Refugium took three tries to really get going and needs weekly trimming to maintain health and optimal benefits
  • If home air is between 600-800 my pH is easy to maintain. Below 600, my pH highs can go above 0.025 of my setpoint during the day period. Above 800 my lows can go below 0.025 of my setpoint.
  • An oversized skimmer was required to stabilize and control my pH (I have an Aeraqua Dou on a 100gal tank ~3X what I need). I believe this was needed to overcome the rest of the tank aeration from powerheads and return pumps.
  • My skimmer is only active to raise or lower pH and comes on for about 6-8 hours a day. Despite only using my skimmer for pH control, it still skims a ton (~1000ml a week)
  • Often figuring out why my pH would go out of alignment was a challenge and had me going down rabbit holes. Ultimately, it always came down to CO2 scrubber, Kalkwasses, and air CO2 levels. Typically lower lows was an indication of CO2 scrubber issue, lower average was a Kalkwasser issue, and higher highs was lower levels of air CO2 due to good weather and open windows and doors.
  • Figuring out when the CO2 media is exhausted was trial and error. I eventually figured out lower lows indicated something was up with my CO2 scrubber. I'm getting roughly 1 month of CO2 scrubbing from my media (6 cups). I use the BRS DUO Jumbo CO2 Scrubber which has 2x 6-cup capacity media holders. I use this setup to maximize the life of the media. Basically monthly I take the 2nd stage cartridge and move it to the 1st stage and add a fresh cartridge to the 2nd stage. This ensures I get the maximum life by fully exhausting the media. I use a similar trick for the di phase of my RODI system.
  • Recirculating air tubing can fill with condensation and impact airflow. You want to make sure your tubing doesn't have any dip to collect the water.
  • Typical CO2 scrubber issues included exhausted CO2 media, clogged airline, no moisture for the media (had this before recirculation), too much water in the media cartridges (before the Jumbo setup) , issue with skimmer performance
  • Typical kalkwasser issues included unsaturated kalk (measured with EC meter) due to bar stirrer (switched to a magnetic stirrer), unsaturated kalk due to much kalk in reactor not allowing the magnetic stirrer to stir or too little kalk, and issues with reservoir running dry. Also caught a tube blockage...
  • Typical indoor CO2 level issues are when indoor air is low in CO2 (open windows) and I can't drive down the pH or when it's way high (lots of people or heating/cooking) and skimmer can't contribute as much. Interesting enough, when it's raining outside CO2 goes up in the house by a little bit.
  • Having the skimmer after the refugium was a mistake for me (at least with chaeto). I was typically cleaning out my skimmer every 6 weeks with just an acetic bath and always found performance went up afterwards as expected. I was having unexpected lower pH lows and thought there was something going on with the CO2 scrubbing...took forever to figure out, long story short, chaeto was getting in the needle wheel. I had to switch the refugium and skimmer locations in the sump.
This is amazing documentation. I will try to eliminate and test everything you have done here to mimic your positive outcome.
 

Mystikal

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
496
Reaction score
460
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have had some luck with the Ph for my tank doing the same as you mentioned. Combination of all really helped the climb. I did notice that have health thick Cheato in the refugium helps significantly, and harvesting only small amounts help stabilize the PH a bit. Opening the windows helped alot, since I work from home I can closely monitor the temperature indoors as well.

1642709534139.png
 

14 foot reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
2,195
Reaction score
3,527
Location
Apex NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For those interested in maintaining pH stability around +/- 0.05 I have a couple of lessons learned. These are things that I found out on my journey to pH stability.
  • Prior to seeking pH stability my tank pH was consistently around ~7.9. However, much of this journey went on before the tank was mature with lots of photosynthetic organisms. I have no doubt that had I just waited, daytime and nighttime pH (with a refugium) would have been higher.
  • It's possible to maintain pH stability around +/- 0.05. My setup is Kalkwasser, reverse light-cycle Refugium, oversized skimmer with recirculating CO2 scrubber, valve to switch between CO2 scrubbed air and indoor air, and controller.
  • A continuous kalkwasser drip was most effective and provided me with a pH boost of about ~0.12
  • Refugium took three tries to really get going and needs weekly trimming to maintain health and optimal benefits
  • If home air is between 600-800 my pH is easy to maintain. Below 600, my pH highs can go above 0.025 of my setpoint during the day period. Above 800 my lows can go below 0.025 of my setpoint.
  • An oversized skimmer was required to stabilize and control my pH (I have an Aeraqua Dou on a 100gal tank ~3X what I need). I believe this was needed to overcome the rest of the tank aeration from powerheads and return pumps.
  • My skimmer is only active to raise or lower pH and comes on for about 6-8 hours a day. Despite only using my skimmer for pH control, it still skims a ton (~1000ml a week)
  • Often figuring out why my pH would go out of alignment was a challenge and had me going down rabbit holes. Ultimately, it always came down to CO2 scrubber, Kalkwasses, and air CO2 levels. Typically lower lows was an indication of CO2 scrubber issue, lower average was a Kalkwasser issue, and higher highs was lower levels of air CO2 due to good weather and open windows and doors.
  • Figuring out when the CO2 media is exhausted was trial and error. I eventually figured out lower lows indicated something was up with my CO2 scrubber. I'm getting roughly 1 month of CO2 scrubbing from my media (6 cups). I use the BRS DUO Jumbo CO2 Scrubber which has 2x 6-cup capacity media holders. I use this setup to maximize the life of the media. Basically monthly I take the 2nd stage cartridge and move it to the 1st stage and add a fresh cartridge to the 2nd stage. This ensures I get the maximum life by fully exhausting the media. I use a similar trick for the di phase of my RODI system.
  • Recirculating air tubing can fill with condensation and impact airflow. You want to make sure your tubing doesn't have any dip to collect the water.
  • Typical CO2 scrubber issues included exhausted CO2 media, clogged airline, no moisture for the media (had this before recirculation), too much water in the media cartridges (before the Jumbo setup) , issue with skimmer performance
  • Typical kalkwasser issues included unsaturated kalk (measured with EC meter) due to bar stirrer (switched to a magnetic stirrer), unsaturated kalk due to much kalk in reactor not allowing the magnetic stirrer to stir or too little kalk, and issues with reservoir running dry. Also caught a tube blockage...
  • Typical indoor CO2 level issues are when indoor air is low in CO2 (open windows) and I can't drive down the pH or when it's way high (lots of people or heating/cooking) and skimmer can't contribute as much. Interesting enough, when it's raining outside CO2 goes up in the house by a little bit.
  • Having the skimmer after the refugium was a mistake for me (at least with chaeto). I was typically cleaning out my skimmer every 6 weeks with just an acetic bath and always found performance went up afterwards as expected. I was having unexpected lower pH lows and thought there was something going on with the CO2 scrubbing...took forever to figure out, long story short, chaeto was getting in the needle wheel. I had to switch the refugium and skimmer locations in the sump.

This is a great right up and a lot of patience and focus.

Great job here.
 

Fusion in reefing: How do you feel about grafted corals?

  • I strongly prefer grafted corals and I seek them out to put in my tank.

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • I find grafted corals appealing and would be open to having them in my tank.

    Votes: 48 55.2%
  • I am indifferent about grafted corals and am not enthusiastic about having them in my tank.

    Votes: 26 29.9%
  • I have reservations about grafted corals and would generally avoid having them in my tank.

    Votes: 7 8.0%
  • I have a negative perception and would avoid having grafted corals in my tank.

    Votes: 3 3.4%
Back
Top