Lumber weight carrying capacity

jjencek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
179
Reaction score
100
Location
Prague - Czech Republic
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am building a rack for my breeding tanks. I am just not familiar with lumber carrying capacity calculations. I need to span 160 cm (63 inches) and I hope not to have any addition vertical support in the middle. I plan to have four 100 kg tanks on the top of each shelf including water. The lumber that I was thinking using was pine 6x12 cm (2.36 x4.72 inches) . How many of these do I need to span across the 160 cm to carry the weight of 400 kg (882 lbs)? The shelf itself will be 60x160 cm (23.6x63 inches).

The rack will have 2 shelves of 4 tanks each plus maybe one larger tank on top. Here is my attempt of a possible side-view drawing of the rack if I were using 4 supporting pieces.

Fish Rack - plan.jpg
 

Doctorgori

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
6,280
Reaction score
8,524
Location
Myrtle Beach
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
1ST pic is how I do it ..exactly how ..
2nd pic is overkill, especially if you are handy with a level and square
I use exterior grade deck screws and waterproof the heck out of wood
forgive the English units but I wouldn’t span anymore than 6 feet (2x4”) without a vertical (column) support for that weight ...
I wouldn’t dispute other competent post/ideas
 

ScottJ

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Messages
1,776
Reaction score
3,436
Location
Rochester Ny
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I like the 2nd design personally. No worries about it not being able to carry the load.

But then, I over build everything:rolleyes:!
 

Reeflux

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
83
Reaction score
134
Location
Traverse City
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I did mine completely different with 6×6 poplar. Really happy with it. Giant span. This thing is a tank. I'm sure you could work out a design similar. It leaves all kinds of space.

If I could get it up there, my brother's Ford ranger could sit on this thing.
 

Attachments

  • 16129626887916931810314582888290.jpg
    16129626887916931810314582888290.jpg
    139.8 KB · Views: 69
  • 16129627167076738121654375253153.jpg
    16129627167076738121654375253153.jpg
    111.8 KB · Views: 73
  • 16129627579778376415231708264485.jpg
    16129627579778376415231708264485.jpg
    111.1 KB · Views: 64

Rjramos

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
1,670
Reaction score
1,425
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am building a rack for my breeding tanks. I am just not familiar with lumber carrying capacity calculations. I need to span 160 cm (63 inches) and I hope not to have any addition vertical support in the middle. I plan to have four 100 kg tanks on the top of each shelf including water. The lumber that I was thinking using was pine 6x12 cm (2.36 x4.72 inches) . How many of these do I need to span across the 160 cm to carry the weight of 400 kg (882 lbs)? The shelf itself will be 60x160 cm (23.6x63 inches).

The rack will have 2 shelves of 4 tanks each plus maybe one larger tank on top. Here is my attempt of a possible side-view drawing of the rack if I were using 4 supporting pieces.

Fish Rack - plan.jpg
That would be very strong and supportive. Doubled up in the corners and a a tripled brace going down the middle of 23.6 inches across. In addition, whatever covering you use ( plywood maybe) is gonna strengthen this further. It shouldn’t sag at all. I have one I built out of 2x4 inch lumber, 48”x24”, 4 shelves. I had 600lbs on it and it doesn’t even sag.
 
OP
OP
jjencek

jjencek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
179
Reaction score
100
Location
Prague - Czech Republic
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok, so here are 3 designs now. Please note that #2 and #3 have the same number of 4 spanning struts - just extra pillar. Would not the two have the same carrying capacity?
 

Attachments

  • Fish Rack 3.jpg
    Fish Rack 3.jpg
    100.3 KB · Views: 82

Soren

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
2,490
Reaction score
7,359
Location
Illinois, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok, so here are 3 designs now. Please note that #2 and #3 have the same number of 4 spanning struts - just extra pillar. Would not the two have the same carrying capacity?
+1 for #2 middle design. Better safety factor than #1, #3 is more than necessary for sufficient safety of #2.
 

ScottJ

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 28, 2020
Messages
1,776
Reaction score
3,436
Location
Rochester Ny
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Number two would be plenty. Given the load and span, 1 may have issues without bigger crossmembers which is not ideal for stacked tanks like this. Three doesn’t gain you anything vs 2. JMO
Yup
 
OP
OP
jjencek

jjencek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
179
Reaction score
100
Location
Prague - Czech Republic
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ok, after your help I plan to use design #2. Each shelf will carry five 62L tanks for a total weight of about 375 Kg.

Here is the front and the side view.
 

Attachments

  • Fish Rack Design.jpg
    Fish Rack Design.jpg
    93 KB · Views: 74
OP
OP
jjencek

jjencek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
179
Reaction score
100
Location
Prague - Czech Republic
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So the rack is done. Did not have enough room for the top tank, but overall I am happy with it. Now the plumbing ...
 

Attachments

  • Fish Rack Built 02.jpg
    Fish Rack Built 02.jpg
    79 KB · Views: 56
  • Fish Rack Built 04.jpg
    Fish Rack Built 04.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 53
  • Fish Rack Built 03.jpg
    Fish Rack Built 03.jpg
    89.1 KB · Views: 57

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 21 36.2%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 25 43.1%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 17 29.3%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new