So nobody has a before and after picture. Cmon a Dino infestation and then gone picture. It's so simple.
Squamosa's growth pictures are great but it would be nice to see others as well, wouldn't it.
There is so much interest and excitement that if we "saw" lots of evidence, it would be so much better than testimonials and so much more impressive.
And the whole bubble size. So there are scientific articles on macro and nano bubbles and they even define sizes. But all we have so far are wood stones and claims that they produce bubbles both micro and nano size, seems best to describe them as best we can which is really small or perhaps tiny bubbles. I'm sure as someone tries to market a nano bubbler for our reefs, they will brag about their ideal bubble size, whatever it may or may not be. And maybe size isn't that important, who knows.
And I certainly understand that this is easy to try and inexpensive with a wood stone and air pump. But questions on safety are appropriate. Or you would be using electrolysis and loading your tank with truly nano bubbles and killing everything with chlorine. It's only appropriate to question as best we can.
I'm not aware of any peer reviewed journal for reef tanks. I don't think anyone seriously wants or expects a peer reviewed article. But most of us would be duly impressed with before and after photos showing coral growth and certainly photos with Dino infection and then Dino infection gone. It would seem that then someone will pick up the ball and want to share their side by side tanks. Simple proofs.
I like Thales skepticism and questions. Cmon, guys show me the money
Squamosa's growth pictures are great but it would be nice to see others as well, wouldn't it.
There is so much interest and excitement that if we "saw" lots of evidence, it would be so much better than testimonials and so much more impressive.
And the whole bubble size. So there are scientific articles on macro and nano bubbles and they even define sizes. But all we have so far are wood stones and claims that they produce bubbles both micro and nano size, seems best to describe them as best we can which is really small or perhaps tiny bubbles. I'm sure as someone tries to market a nano bubbler for our reefs, they will brag about their ideal bubble size, whatever it may or may not be. And maybe size isn't that important, who knows.
And I certainly understand that this is easy to try and inexpensive with a wood stone and air pump. But questions on safety are appropriate. Or you would be using electrolysis and loading your tank with truly nano bubbles and killing everything with chlorine. It's only appropriate to question as best we can.
I'm not aware of any peer reviewed journal for reef tanks. I don't think anyone seriously wants or expects a peer reviewed article. But most of us would be duly impressed with before and after photos showing coral growth and certainly photos with Dino infection and then Dino infection gone. It would seem that then someone will pick up the ball and want to share their side by side tanks. Simple proofs.
I like Thales skepticism and questions. Cmon, guys show me the money