Micro Bubbling

Cruz_Arias

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
789
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What you say has nothing to do with the actual scientific reason and evidence of why nanobubbles have a negative charge (which has to do with the crowding of different ions ions at the tiny curved surface and the fact that hydroxide ions are slightly more prevalent there than H+ ions).).
Being that OH- is more prevalent, that would create a more negative net charge locally.
 

Cruz_Arias

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
789
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The devices you use.
Ahh ok... yeah, we see lots of observed benefits. But once again anecdotal but, we can grow some crazy sps though. So whatever we're doing, we wanted to share.

received_685889284912793.jpeg
 

Cruz_Arias

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
789
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sorry, where did it say bacteria have a net positive charge? It doesn't.
It says it depends on the membrane phenotype... and using dielectrophoresis to separate good bacteria from bad, the bacteria being acted upon need a net charge to be affected, either positive or negative.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,246
Reaction score
92,261
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ahh ok... yeah, we see lots of observed benefits. But once again anecdotal but, we can grow some crazy sps though. So whatever we're doing, we wanted to share.

That's certainly a reasonable claim. :)
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,246
Reaction score
92,261
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It says it depends on the membrane phenotype... and using dielectrophoresis to separate good bacteria from bad, the bacteria being acted upon need a net charge to be affected, either positive or negative.

Yes, but you separate them based on charge to mass ratio (or some function of mass and volume that imapcts their diffusion with a given charge in a given field), sort of like in mass spectroscopy, and it still works even if they are all negative. :)
 

Cruz_Arias

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
789
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
DEP is similar to electroplating... utilizing cathodes and anodes...

Positively charged particulates or bacterial organisms travel towards the anodes and the negatively charged particulates or organisms travel towards the cathode...

Pretty interesting stuff that also goes beyond me... lol

I'll send you a video (HD) of the extremely small bubble mist we generate.

It's a lot finer than microbubbles, Randy... that's for darned sure!

Screenshot_2016-11-29-21-00-18.png
 

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,105
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Its an enthusiastic thing. Id try it it cant hurt. So just put an airstone in the intake of a pump?

But why doesn't a skimmer perform the same way?

If creating a charge is desireable, is it beneficial to disconnect a grounding probe?
 

Cruz_Arias

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
789
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
We place the wooden air stone in the weir before the return pump chamber.
This is a controlled method... and you'd need an air line valve to control the air volume going to the diffuser.

2016-11-15 06.27.36.jpg
 

Cruz_Arias

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
789
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Its an enthusiastic thing. Id try it it cant hurt. So just put an airstone in the intake of a pump?

But why doesn't a skimmer perform the same way?

If creating a charge is desireable, is it beneficial to disconnect a grounding probe?
A skimmer works similarly, but the addition of the bubble traps have isolated any benefit from micro bubbling that we have seen prior to bubble blocking.

Also, most do not run a fresh air line to their skimmer air intake and suck up a lot of metabolic waste gasses that degas in the overflow return chamber in the sump area (typically this area under the stand has poor ventilation and poor air quality)
 

Rmckoy

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
10,640
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thought I’d bring this post back to the surface.
Contrary to old reefing methods where we avoided bubbles as they were said to be trapped in the fish gills or killing corals .

has there been any further testing ?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,246
Reaction score
92,261
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thought I’d bring this post back to the surface.
Contrary to old reefing methods where we avoided bubbles as they were said to be trapped in the fish gills or killing corals .

has there been any further testing ?

I certainly heard if a number of folks that use bubbling, but I do not recall seeing any actual quantified testing recently.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 26.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 34.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.5%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.8%
Back
Top