Microscopic yellow and red worm? Critter ID please

LilacBrandy

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 19, 2025
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Location
Perth
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello,

Can someone help me identify this critter. I've had an unhappy Hammer for a while so I decided to give it an iodine dip. I checked what was left in the dip water and found a couple of copepods but also several of these guys. This photo is at 10X - so they are about a quarter of the size of a copepod or even smaller. They have red bands like shrimp but aren't the same shape as a shrimp. They're uniform along the length and have about 35 legs on each side. There are four rounded feelers on its head.
1764386152683.png
 

Peace River

Thrive Master
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
24,733
Reaction score
172,769
Location
USA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
It may be polychaete worm larvae or new juvenile. If so, then not harmful. Hopefully others will chime in soon!
 
OP
OP
L

LilacBrandy

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 19, 2025
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Location
Perth
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It may be polychaete worm larvae or new juvenile. If so, then not harmful. Hopefully others will chime in soon!
Thanks for replying, this is a great suggestion. Would love to know which species, the shrimp colouring is so prominent but it's definitely a polychaete like you mentioned.
 

Peace River

Thrive Master
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
24,733
Reaction score
172,769
Location
USA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thanks for replying, this is a great suggestion. Would love to know which species, the shrimp colouring is so prominent but it's definitely a polychaete like you mentioned.
It is most likely from the family Syllidae. Please know that the bright colors will likely fade as it matures.
 

EnterName

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2025
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,931
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm confused... That looks like 100x magnification (10x objective and 10x ocular), which would make the specimen larger than copepods. Copepods are visible but quite hard to see with the naked eye due to being so small.

Did you mean amphipods by any chance? (see https://www.reef2reef.com/ams/guide-to-common-hitchhikers-in-reef-tanks.861/)

If that's 100x it could very well be a syllidae as was already said. I've never heard of something similar that is harmful. The harmful worms are usually large enough to observe pretty well without microscope.
 
OP
OP
L

LilacBrandy

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 19, 2025
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Location
Perth
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm confused... That looks like 100x magnification (10x objective and 10x ocular), which would make the specimen larger than copepods. Copepods are visible but quite hard to see with the naked eye due to being so small.

Did you mean amphipods by any chance? (see https://www.reef2reef.com/ams/guide-to-common-hitchhikers-in-reef-tanks.861/)

If that's 100x it could very well be a syllidae as was already said. I've never heard of something similar that is harmful. The harmful worms are usually large enough to observe pretty well without microscope.
You're correct, it is 100x times and I'd been looking at copepods on the slide but I was using the 40x (so 400x) for them. Totally mixed up my magnifications. Thanks for clearing it up, these are in fact bigger than copepods, maybe double the size.
 

EnterName

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2025
Messages
808
Reaction score
1,931
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm confused... That looks like 100x magnification (10x objective and 10x ocular), which would make the specimen larger than copepods. Copepods are visible but quite hard to see with the naked eye due to being so small.

Did you mean amphipods by any chance? (see https://www.reef2reef.com/ams/guide-to-common-hitchhikers-in-reef-tanks.861/)

If that's 100x it could very well be a syllidae as was already said. I've never heard of something similar that is harmful. The harmful worms are usually large enough to observe pretty well without microscope.
You're correct, it is 100x times and I'd been looking at copepods on the slide but I was using the 40x (so 400x) for them. Totally mixed up my magnifications. Thanks for clearing it up, these are in fact bigger than copepods, maybe double the size.
Glad I was able to clear things up a bit. It's just some polychaete and is very likely just cleaning up detritus. There are millions of these in pretty much every established tank even though species might differ.

 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top