Okay, Let's Talk UV Filters

sbash

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
1,107
Location
Ottawa, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Everybody,

This past year, I have been experimenting with the Aquafit Aquatics 24W UV filter. I bought it to treat a specific problem, and it worked very well. So now it is another excellent tool in my toolbox, well, plastic tool tub...

However, since it worked so well, I wonder about running UV full time on my 220.

So, here's the pickle:
This one is a 24W, but it is rated for tanks up to 120 Gallons, while the Coralife Turbo Twist 18W is rated for up to 250 gallons, yet the Aqueon QuietFlow 18W only rated for 150 gallons...

Any idea why the discrepancy?
 

Journeyman

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 16, 2019
Messages
236
Reaction score
309
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It may depend on the re flow rate through the UV filter. I tried to do research on this a while back. I found that there is no real consensus on size. The more powerful the UV the less contact time it needs with the water. I supposed in theory you could go with a far lower power UV light with a really low flow.
 

Lowell Lemon

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 23, 2015
Messages
5,357
Reaction score
23,578
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi Everybody,

This past year, I have been experimenting with the Aquafit Aquatics 24W UV filter. I bought it to treat a specific problem, and it worked very well. So now it is another excellent tool in my toolbox, well, plastic tool tub...

However, since it worked so well, I wonder about running UV full time on my 220.

So, here's the pickle:
This one is a 24W, but it is rated for tanks up to 120 Gallons, while the Coralife Turbo Twist 18W is rated for up to 250 gallons, yet the Aqueon QuietFlow 18W only rated for 150 gallons...

Any idea why the discrepancy?

Read the articles from American Aquarium Products on line. They are located in Oregon, US. They have some very helpful information on the subject.
 
OP
OP
sbash

sbash

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
1,107
Location
Ottawa, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It may depend on the re flow rate through the UV filter. I tried to do research on this a while back. I found that there is no real consensus on size. The more powerful the UV the less contact time it needs with the water. I supposed in theory you could go with a far lower power UV light with a really low flow.

This was my theory too. The pump on the Aquafit (24W) is only about 100GPH, when the Coralife 18W recommends 200 gph minimum - but the Coralife is designed to keep the water in there longer). So perhaps that makes all the difference too.

Read the articles from American Aquarium Products on line. They are located in Oregon, US. They have some very helpful information on the subject.

Thanks, I'll look into that.
 

rkpetersen

walked the sand with the crustaceans
View Badges
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
4,529
Reaction score
5,665
Location
Near Seattle
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So many factors. Not just wattage, but bulb design, sleeve design, and flow rate all influence effectiveness. The ratings manufacturers give don't mean much, and in part they depend on what the 'rating' is designed to kill, which they rarely explicitly say. Bacteria are easier to kill than algae which are easier to kill than protozoans. So if a sterilizer is 'rated' for 300 gallons, that may be for suppression of an algae problem, and to handle a crypto outbreak might only be effective for a much smaller tank.

What you really want to see is a graph of flow rate on the x axis versus UVC energy output in microwatt-seconds/cm2 on the y-axis, for each sterilizer design and bulb combo. Then you can determine the flow rate that will work for what you're trying to kill. For example you mention the Turbo Twist 18W. The chart for that sterilizer will kill algae at a flow rate of 240 gph but for parasites it has to be much slower at 110 gph. And you still have to decide if that available flow rate is enough for the size of your tank.
 

ca1ore

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
14,193
Reaction score
19,711
Location
Stamford, CT
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Plus there’s really no standards for sizing - so the vendors just mostly make them up LOL
 
OP
OP
sbash

sbash

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
1,107
Location
Ottawa, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The chart for that sterilizer will kill algae at a flow rate of 240 gph but for parasites it has to be much slower at 110 gph. And you still have to decide if that available flow rate is enough for the size of your tank.

Interesting thanks. That last sentence is the kicker. With the UV filter runing 100 GPH, on a 50 gallon tank, it won't process ALL the water twice per hour, let alone on a 50 gallon sump with a 500 GPH turnover (those numbers are not real to my systems)... You see where I am going with this... lol...

Plus there’s really no standards for sizing - so the vendors just mostly make them up LOL
Yeah, lol, it seems that way...
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.9%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 42 34.4%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top