PAR and PAR Time

whotzler

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
104
Reaction score
64
Location
Minnesota
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How does PAR and time relate?

I will start this out simple.

Is 500 PAR for 1 hr = to 100 PAR for 5 hours?

If I wanted to increase total PAR a coral receives by 10% would it be the same to increase time by 10% as it would to increase the PAR number by 10% for the same amount of time?

To me, mathematically these would all be the same.
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,625
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes. That’s correct.
So when adjusting, you can go a. It longer or a bit more intensity.
 
OP
OP
whotzler

whotzler

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
104
Reaction score
64
Location
Minnesota
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

I got some help from my local club TCMAS on this, and found this video pretty interesting. The first couple graphs explain this very well. The rate of photosynthesis is not on a linear scale. For this coral 50 PAR = a photosynthesis rate of 23 and at 100 PAR it is 37 and at 200 its 44. So in this example the PAR level doubles 50/100/200 but the rate of photosynthesis does not follow the same scale 23/37/44. Doubling PAR from 100 to 200 only increases photosynthesis from 37 to 44, that is a small jump for twice the available energy. But doubling PAR from 50 to 100 brings up photosynthesis from 23 to 37, much more bang for you buck here. Bottom line, it is not that simple, double PAR does not equal double photosynthesis. Find the sweet spot and stay in that range.
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,342
Reaction score
21,756
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As described, there are some other variables. First, you need to be careful not to saturate the coral with light. 1 hour at 3200 is not good and is not equal to 8 hours at 400 PAR (even 500 in your example might be too much for some coral). Second, you have to have a competent amount of light on the low side - 50 PAR for a shallow water acropora is not going to do much even if you run them for 12 hours. Lastly, 20 hours of light is no good so if you cannot get what you want done in 10-12 hours, then you need more output.

While all of the theory and stuff points to just doing math, I would use this for anything outside of 20-25% on the low or high side. The only time that I would use this theory is if you are just slightly under lighting corals and don't want to buy more light. A great use would be if you had some lights that could do 160 PAR on a mixed reef and you wanted 180-200... then adding a few more hours can get you there.
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 44 35.5%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top