Par suggestion new torch

kilnakorr

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
575
Location
Denmark
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi

I got a gold torch about a week ago.
placed it at the bottom in low flow.
It's slowly opening, and wondering if it could be to low light.
I also got my hands on a seneye to measure PAR.
Question is, what PAR would you recommend?
I haven't tested the exact spot but think it's only 50-ish PAR.
Would it be a good idea to move it to more light, and if so how much / max PAR recommendations?
20210313_175307.jpg

Its open, but not much.
 

LegendaryCG

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 22, 2019
Messages
2,005
Reaction score
2,546
Location
Fond Du Lac, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I give mine around a 100. They don’t need a lot to be happy. 50 might be fine once it settles in if it is catching some food to help supplement the photosynthesis.
 
OP
OP
K

kilnakorr

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
575
Location
Denmark
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I give mine around a 100. They don’t need a lot to be happy. 50 might be fine once it settles in if it is catching some food to help supplement the photosynthesis.
I wonder what increase will be acceptable?
I'm thinking from 50 to 100 PAR isn't the same as from 100 to 150?

I'll test and update, so we know the difference :)
 
OP
OP
K

kilnakorr

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
575
Location
Denmark
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is currently sitting at around 40 PAR
New place is 90 PAR.
This shouldn't be an issue right?
 

Uncle99

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
13,168
Reaction score
20,195
Location
North, Strong and Free
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Keep in mind that any change in light will affect any other photosynthetic organisms you might have, same for any future additions.

IMM, torches are slower to become happy and like MG around 1400ppm.

If there are no other corals, then I might raise that 20 PAR, then no other changes for a month at which time, it’s health is reassessed.

If there are others and you are happy with them, I might just stay where I am for a month, then reassess.

These two are about 80 PAR.
D18A87AD-2386-403A-94A1-9DB88DB0E388.jpeg
 

Uncle99

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
13,168
Reaction score
20,195
Location
North, Strong and Free
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is currently sitting at around 40 PAR
New place is 90 PAR.
This shouldn't be an issue right?
It’s a bit of a jump but just stay there now and reassess in a week. My torches really hate to be moved.
Not concerned with your 90, but slower is always better.
If she pulls back for any more than 3 days in a row, back off 20.
 
OP
OP
K

kilnakorr

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
575
Location
Denmark
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It’s a bit of a jump but just stay there now and reassess in a week. My torches really hate to be moved.
Not concerned with your 90, but slower is always better.
If she pulls back for any more than 3 days in a row, back off 20.
I'll try and watch it over the weekend.
If 'she' don't open up as much as before, I'll lower the light a bit.
 
OP
OP
K

kilnakorr

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 4, 2020
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
575
Location
Denmark
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Keep in mind that any change in light will affect any other photosynthetic organisms you might have, same for any future additions.

IMM, torches are slower to become happy and like MG around 1400ppm.

If there are no other corals, then I might raise that 20 PAR, then no other changes for a month at which time, it’s health is reassessed.

If there are others and you are happy with them, I might just stay where I am for a month, then reassess.

These two are about 80 PAR.
D18A87AD-2386-403A-94A1-9DB88DB0E388.jpeg
I was talking about moving the coral, not adjusting light, so shouldn't effect anything else.

I did move it, and it seems just as 'happy' in the new spot:

20210314_131241.jpg
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 56 41.2%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 3.7%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 53 39.0%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 41 30.1%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new