PAR vs PUR

mikellini

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
170
Reaction score
2
Location
Vernon BC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Can someone explain the difference between PAR (photosynthetically active radiation) and PUR (photosynthetically useful radiation)? PUR seems to be part of the marketing for a feature the Seneye has, and I get that it's supposed to consider spectrum and what corals actually use... but is this quantifiable/accurate or just a marketing gimmick?
 

scardall

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
2,609
Reaction score
1,762
Location
Cocoa, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wish I knew more too

I know that PUR is more important than PAR. "www.americanaquariumproducts.com" has a representative that opened my eyes to this subject.
 
Last edited:

hart24601

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
6,719
Reaction score
6,596
Location
Iowa
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The basic idea is that PAR is all the light energy between 400nm and 700nm. PUR (Photosynthetically Usable Radiation) looks at light energy over the same wavelengths, but only the spectrum where chlorophyll utilizes the energy. The best example is the green spectrum. Green is not very well utilized by chlorophyll - so if you had a light that only produced green light you could have very high PAR values, but very little PUR because the light can't be used for making energy by the chlorophyll very well.


However while something like a green wavelength may not do much for the coral, it can do wonders for our viewing pleasure. For this reason I think lime LEDs are great. You can turn them off to measure intensity for light and coral placement, then turn them on and adjust them for the desired brightness/color you want for just your viewing pleasure. No they don't do anything for the coral, but I think this is one of the next steps for LED fixtures - we can provide plenty of PUR now with LEDs, lets focus on getting complete coverage and then being able to dial the brightness and color to what looks pleasing to our eyes.
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 48 41.4%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 5 4.3%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 47 40.5%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 34 29.3%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new