Jay would this forum benefit in having a fully dedicated no qt forum to inspect claims or is it better to mix the debate here among the qt and fallow advice… what’s your take on the issue
if there was a forum where folks who want to practice and advise no fallow no qt options could run control attempts it really would put all the debating into action, we are never going to make headway when someone gives procedural advice based on their home system, there’s nothing concrete to debate and inspect like there is for pages here. I really feel that the accountability that comes with being required to manage public tanks will draw an effective contrast in these two running and highly opposing models.
for pages I can click here and get my own outcomes for fallow and qt based on others advice, your summary not required to inspect outcomes, and if I could get that same inspection ability for all natural methods it would be ideal. I currently just have to accept someone’s testimony or their own submitted pics for proof it worked well at home, I need third party verification
if there was a forum where folks who want to practice and advise no fallow no qt options could run control attempts it really would put all the debating into action, we are never going to make headway when someone gives procedural advice based on their home system, there’s nothing concrete to debate and inspect like there is for pages here. I really feel that the accountability that comes with being required to manage public tanks will draw an effective contrast in these two running and highly opposing models.
for pages I can click here and get my own outcomes for fallow and qt based on others advice, your summary not required to inspect outcomes, and if I could get that same inspection ability for all natural methods it would be ideal. I currently just have to accept someone’s testimony or their own submitted pics for proof it worked well at home, I need third party verification