Reactor media question

JonPhillips

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
581
Reaction score
289
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Have a two little fishes reactor 150. In your opinion, what media/cycles of media will be most helpful?


My tank is 65g. decent amount of live rock. sump with live rock currently in it. stocked with coral beauty, lemon peel, two clowns, mandarin, scooter, peppermint shrimp, crabs, snails.

looking to grow soft and hard corals...
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,346
Reaction score
20,852
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have always ran both GFO and Carbon. I guess it depends on what you are trying to achieve? Do you have an algae/phosphates issue? If not, then I would just run carbon for water clarity and to keep any soft coral attacks at bay :-)
 
OP
OP
JonPhillips

JonPhillips

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
581
Reaction score
289
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have always ran both GFO and Carbon. I guess it depends on what you are trying to achieve? Do you have an algae/phosphates issue? If not, then I would just run carbon for water clarity and to keep any soft coral attacks at bay :)

Good advice. Thank you. trying to achieve the most colorful reef possible. No problems currently. Guess I am actually faking it right now as my tank if FOWLR. Planning to try coral, just don't want to kill them right off the bat...
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,346
Reaction score
20,852
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sounds like you are in good shape.....ideally it is a good idea to at least have the availability of both carbon and GFO to combat any future problems.
 

JPSika08

Always Learning
View Badges
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
284
Reaction score
278
Location
Guatemala
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Problem of using one reactor for both media is that Carbon has to be changed sooner than GFO so it's a hassle changing it, also, GFO is requires tumble a little and Carbon doesn't, managing flow is achievable but more difficult to achieve in one chamber.

In my tank as it's new, I'm just running carbon, just letting nature take its course, once I have a more established system, if phosphates are still a problem, I'm just 1 turning valve away to kick start the GFO reactor.

My suggestion would be, get a good phosphate test kit and apply GFO only if needed.
 
OP
OP
JonPhillips

JonPhillips

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
581
Reaction score
289
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Problem of using one reactor for both media is that Carbon has to be changed sooner than GFO so it's a hassle changing it, also, GFO is requires tumble a little and Carbon doesn't, managing flow is achievable but more difficult to achieve in one chamber.

In my tank as it's new, I'm just running carbon, just letting nature take its course, once I have a more established system, if phosphates are still a problem, I'm just 1 turning valve away to kick start the GFO reactor.

My suggestion would be, get a good phosphate test kit and apply GFO only if needed.

Thanks, man. Appreciated your youtube video on this subject as well. Very helpful!
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 34.2%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 10 8.3%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.7%
Back
Top