RO/DI TDS readings

Phil D.

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
1,355
Reaction score
1,441
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I recently changed my filters, RO membrane and DI cartridges and checked the TDS of all the various stages. Out of the faucet =375, out of the RO membranes, (I have the water saver kit with 2 membranes), 6 and finally out of the dual DI cartridges = 0!! So, I guestimate I will be able to make a lot of water. What do you guys think?
 

Ron Reefman

Lets Go Snorkeling!
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
9,285
Reaction score
20,887
Location
SW Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sounds fairly good to me. The RO reading seems a tiny bit high at 6. Is your dual membrane inline or parallel? That is, does all the water pass through one membrane and then the second, or is the input split in two and water only passes through one membrane?

My system starts with similar TDS and reads 2 or 3 out of the RO. But I have 2 BIG RO membranes. The stainless steel tubes are the RO membranes.

20190430_083731.jpg
 
OP
OP
Phil D.

Phil D.

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
1,355
Reaction score
1,441
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The dual RO's are set up where the waste water goes from the first one into the second. Then the product water is a "T'd" together output into the DI's
 

Ron Reefman

Lets Go Snorkeling!
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
9,285
Reaction score
20,887
Location
SW Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Then I'd say your TDS of 6 isn't bad... not great, but not bad. I'd live with it.
 

CJBuckeyes

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 10, 2016
Messages
263
Reaction score
163
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a dual membrane setup as well, and get a reading of 4 before it goes to DI. My source water is around 600 tds.

I think your reading of 6 is fine. The tds meters likely aren’t that accurate.
 

Water Dog

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
4,219
Reaction score
4,892
Location
Fairfield, CT
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a dual membrane setup as well, and get a reading of 4 before it goes to DI. My source water is around 600 tds.

I think your reading of 6 is fine. The tds meters likely aren’t that accurate.

Wow! For 600 TDS source water, insanely efficient! What brand RO membranes are you using?
 

Ewok1

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Messages
221
Reaction score
185
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I recently changed my filters, RO membrane and DI cartridges and checked the TDS of all the various stages. Out of the faucet =375, out of the RO membranes, (I have the water saver kit with 2 membranes), 6 and finally out of the dual DI cartridges = 0!! So, I guestimate I will be able to make a lot of water. What do you guys think?
0 is always good. Anything above=bad and you’ll get algae and dead corals overtime.
 

Ron Reefman

Lets Go Snorkeling!
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
9,285
Reaction score
20,887
Location
SW Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
0 is always good. Anything above=bad and you’ll get algae and dead corals overtime.

Whoa there @Ewok1! IMHO that statement is WAY, way out of line.

TDS readings above zero are not a problem unless the cause is something like a heavy metal or some other toxin. Both of which are quite rare, especially from city water sources.

Lots of reefers use water with TDS readings from above zero to as high as 10 or 20 and have no issues.

The most common cause for TDS readings above zero are harmless. A friend of mine has a 200g tank with lots of fish and corals. He uses well water that he does NOT run through an RO/DI system. The TDS starts at very high numbers that change a lot over time, but are alway in the 800 to 1200 range. He then stores it in large open tanks with lots of surface open to the air. He treats the water with chlorine and circulates it for several days and then lets it sit fallow for a day. He then runs the top 98% of the water through a simple filter and ends up with water having TDS readings in the 100 to 200 range. If it's higher he filters it again. He's not killing fish, has great looking corals and he has very little issue with algae.
 

Miller535

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2019
Messages
2,203
Reaction score
1,936
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Whoa there @Ewok1! IMHO that statement is WAY, way out of line.

TDS readings above zero are not a problem unless the cause is something like a heavy metal or some other toxin. Both of which are quite rare, especially from city water sources.

Lots of reefers use water with TDS readings from above zero to as high as 10 or 20 and have no issues.

The most common cause for TDS readings above zero are harmless. A friend of mine has a 200g tank with lots of fish and corals. He uses well water that he does NOT run through an RO/DI system. The TDS starts at very high numbers that change a lot over time, but are alway in the 800 to 1200 range. He then stores it in large open tanks with lots of surface open to the air. He treats the water with chlorine and circulates it for several days and then lets it sit fallow for a day. He then runs the top 98% of the water through a simple filter and ends up with water having TDS readings in the 100 to 200 range. If it's higher he filters it again. He's not killing fish, has great looking corals and he has very little issue with algae.

While I do not agree with his statement that it WILL result in algae and dead corals. It can happen. Some places have really clean water, some do not. A tds of say 10 could be harmless, but it may not. And for the average reefer, and all the more water the average reefer uses, changing the filters a little earlier isn't going to make more then a few bucks difference in a year. So why even take the chance?
 

K7BMG

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
1,981
Reaction score
1,898
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Whoa there @Ewok1! IMHO that statement is WAY, way out of line.

TDS readings above zero are not a problem unless the cause is something like a heavy metal or some other toxin. Both of which are quite rare, especially from city water sources.

Lots of reefers use water with TDS readings from above zero to as high as 10 or 20 and have no issues.

The most common cause for TDS readings above zero are harmless. A friend of mine has a 200g tank with lots of fish and corals. He uses well water that he does NOT run through an RO/DI system. The TDS starts at very high numbers that change a lot over time, but are alway in the 800 to 1200 range. He then stores it in large open tanks with lots of surface open to the air. He treats the water with chlorine and circulates it for several days and then lets it sit fallow for a day. He then runs the top 98% of the water through a simple filter and ends up with water having TDS readings in the 100 to 200 range. If it's higher he filters it again. He's not killing fish, has great looking corals and he has very little issue with algae.

Respectfully. Yes and thats fine FOR HIM.
But that does not mean that will work for anyone else.

If your TDS meter reads 0 on the output theres no doubt you will be ok.
It does not matter what it reade on the source but its nice to know.
It does not matter what the reading is in between your RO and DI canisters. But agan its nice to know.

The nice to knows will help determine when things need replaced.
As long as you have 0 on the output you know your golden.
 

Miller535

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2019
Messages
2,203
Reaction score
1,936
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a dual membrane setup as well, and get a reading of 4 before it goes to DI. My source water is around 600 tds.

I think your reading of 6 is fine. The tds meters likely aren’t that accurate.

Most of them can be calibrated. BRS even sells calibration solution for them. The HM that's on mine I BELIEVE says to calibrate it every couple of years. But I admittedly have not.
 

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 34 44.2%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 19 24.7%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 22 28.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 2 2.6%
Back
Top