Switching over to Calcium Reactor suggestions????

Scubabum

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
745
Reaction score
1,037
Location
United States
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Happy new year everyone. So the time has come and I've decided to make the move over to a Calcium Reactor. Currently I'm dosing the AquaForest "balling Method" tank is stable and overall growth and color is impressive. As most of us know, tanks like stability and consistency. So I pose the question. Should I continue to dose and cut my dosing down as I make the switch or just shut the dosing pump down and tune in the reactor? The guys over at BRS suggested taking it slowly and a few of my friends that made the switch just turned off the doser and switched. So looking for input from any of you that have made the switch. Thanks in advance.
 

d2mini

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
5,141
Reaction score
8,415
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMO you can go either way. I think I'd just do the switch cold turkey, but test ALK twice a day in the beginning.
Doing it this way should get you dialed in quicker than if you are trying to manage two separate systems, decreasing one and increasing the other.
 

LouieP

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 1, 2013
Messages
512
Reaction score
267
Location
Melbourne FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Set up your CaRx and manually dose until you get it dailed in. Remeber with any change it could tick off your corals for 6-8 weeks. Test multiple times a day & at the same time of day and manually dose any shortage.

Dont rely on your CaRx to increase Alk, Ca or Mag. Use it to keep it stable.
 

JDtimk

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Messages
221
Reaction score
162
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I switched to a calcium reactor from two part dosing this is what I did.

I kept the two part dosing up at normal frequency and set up the calcium reactor with a near unbroken stream of effluent and a pH of 7.5 in the reactor. I let that run for awhile and then began to increase the pH in the reactor slowly and tested the effluent and the tank DKH. As the tank DKH began to rise slowly I would back down the dosing frequency to maintain the tank target DKH.
I completed the transfer to calcium reactor only over the course of one weekend with some fine tuning over the next couple of days. The tank DKH stayed real stable.

I also liked the fact that using that method I was able to find and workout any issues with getting the calcium reactor up and functioning without compromising the tank stability.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top