Ultra low maintenance anemone tank without water changes?

thejacgues

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
61
Reaction score
13
Location
Poland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey guys,

I would like to build a new aquarium - approx. 150l hosting only anemones with maybe a few simple softies, a few shirmps, crabs and clownfish.

Filtration:
Hang of filter with biomedia
A little of activated carbon
A few macroalgae in the display tank

I wonder how much macro and micro would be consumed in such system without stony corals. I would like to avoid doing any water changes and maybe just replenish some of the chemicals from time to time (based on ICP test done once per a few months). I would just test NO3 and PO4 on a frequent basis to see if lack of skimmer isn't disturbing anything and maybe involve a very weak carbon dosing to stimulate the biology.

What do you think?
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
T be blunt, haveing BTAs that were acquired 10, 15 or 25 years ago and having a better understanding of the roles of DOC in reef systems I don't see a ssytem can be maintained for years without water changes to remove detrimental DOC.
 

Tuan’s Reef

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
3,807
Reaction score
3,736
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
T be blunt, haveing BTAs that were acquired 10, 15 or 25 years ago and having a better understanding of the roles of DOC in reef systems I don't see a ssytem can be maintained for years without water changes to remove detrimental DOC.

Even with advances in technology such as uses of Ozone generators and UV ?
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
UVs don't remove DOC. In his presentaion at Next Wave 20ll in Dallas Charles Delbeek related testing done at the Steinhart Aquarium advised aquarists not to use OZone due to the inconsistancy of the equipment available to aquarists and the difficulty in maintining proper dosages. Additionally there are microbes that are ozone refractory, ie not killed by ozone. More importantly, over the last couple of decades a great deal of research has been done on the roles of DOC in promoting microbial growth in holobionts that can cause issues with corals (and anemones). This DOC can roughly be divided into labile, semi-refractory and refractory. The refractory component of DOC is usually not available for microbial growth but with the use of ozone it is broken down into labile forms that can then be used by microbes as a food source to reproduce potentially causing problems in animal holobionts by causing pathogenic shifts or hypoxic conditions with excessive population numbers.

Here's some links by scientists studying reef ecosystems you might find informative:

"Coral Reefs in the Microbial Seas" This video compliments Rohwer's book of the same title (Paper back is ~$20, Kindle is ~$10), both deal with the conflicting roles of the different types of DOC in reef ecosystems. While there is overlap bewteen his book and the video both have information not covered by the other and together give a broader view of the complex relationships found in reef ecosystems


Changing Seas - Mysterious Microbes


Microbial view of Coral Decline


Nitrogen cycling in hte coral holobiont


BActeria and Sponges


Maintenance of Coral Reef Health (refferences at the end)


Optical Feedback Loop in Colorful Coral Bleaching


DNA Sequencing and the Reef Tank Microbiome



And if you want to dig into the research a little more here's a data bomb.

Global microbialization of coral reefs - DDAM Proven

Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae‐mediated, microbe‐induced coral mortality

Influence of coral and algal exudates on microbially mediated reef metabolism.
Coral DOC improves oxygen (autotrophy), algae DOC reduces oxygen (heterotrophy).

Role of elevated organic carbon levels and microbial activity in coral mortality

Effects of Coral Reef Benthic Primary Producers on Dissolved Organic Carbon and Microbial Activity
Algae releases significantly more DOC into the water than coral.

Pathologies and mortality rates caused by organic carbon and nutrient stressors in three Caribbean coral species.
DOC caused coral death but not high nitrates, phosphates or ammonium.

Visualization of oxygen distribution patterns caused by coral and algae

Biological oxygen demand optode analysis of coral reef-associated microbial communities exposed to algal exudates
Exposure to exudates derived from turf algae stimulated higher oxygen drawdown by the coral-associated bacteria.

Microbial ecology: Algae feed a shift on coral reefs

Coral and macroalgal exudates vary in neutral sugar composition and differentially enrich reef bacterioplankton lineages.

Sugar enrichment provides evidence for a role of nitrogen fixation in coral bleaching

Elevated ammonium delays the impairment of the coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis during labile carbon pollution
(here's an argument for maintaining heavy fish loads if you're carbon dosing)

Excess labile carbon promotes the expression of virulence factors in coral reef bacterioplankton

Unseen players shape benthic competition on coral reefs.

Allelochemicals Produced by Brown Macroalgae of the Lobophora Genus Are Active against Coral Larvae and Associated Bacteria, Supporting Pathogenic Shifts to Vibrio Dominance.

Macroalgae decrease growth and alter microbial community structure of the reef-building coral, Porites astreoides.

Macroalgal extracts induce bacterial assemblage shifts and sublethal tissue stress in Caribbean corals.

Biophysical and physiological processes causing oxygen loss from coral reefs.


Coral Reef Microorganisms in a Changing Climate, Fig 3

Ecosystem Microbiology of Coral Reefs: Linking Genomic, Metabolomic, and Biogeochemical Dynamics from Animal Symbioses to Reefscape Processes


Because sponges are essential players in the carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle(s) on reefs here's some links to research done with them.

Element cycling on tropical coral reefs.
This is Jasper de Geoij's ground breaking research on reef sponge finding some species process labile DOC 1000X faster than bacterioplankton. (The introduction is in Dutch but the content is in English.)

Sponge symbionts and the marine P cycle

Phosphorus sequestration in the form of polyphosphate by microbial symbionts in marine sponges

Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop.
Sponges treat DOC from algae differently than DOC from corals

A Vicious Circle? Altered Carbon and Nutrient Cycling May Explain the Low Resilience of Caribbean Coral Reefs

Surviving in a Marine Desert The Sponge Loop Retains Resources Within Coral Reefs
Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen are quickly processed by sponges and released back into the reef food web in hours as carbon and nitrogen rich detritus.

Natural Diet of Coral-Excavating Sponges Consists Mainly of Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)

The Role of Marine Sponges in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles of COral Reefs and Nearshore Environments.

And since we're discussing favorable and not so favorable bacteria here's a paper looking at how different corals and polyps are influencing the bacteria in the water column.
Aura-biomes are present in the water layer above coral reef benthic macro-organisms
 

Paleozoic_reefer

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 10, 2017
Messages
1,328
Reaction score
2,622
Location
West Texas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
UVs don't remove DOC. In his presentaion at Next Wave 20ll in Dallas Charles Delbeek related testing done at the Steinhart Aquarium advised aquarists not to use OZone due to the inconsistancy of the equipment available to aquarists and the difficulty in maintining proper dosages. Additionally there are microbes that are ozone refractory, ie not killed by ozone. More importantly, over the last couple of decades a great deal of research has been done on the roles of DOC in promoting microbial growth in holobionts that can cause issues with corals (and anemones). This DOC can roughly be divided into labile, semi-refractory and refractory. The refractory component of DOC is usually not available for microbial growth but with the use of ozone it is broken down into labile forms that can then be used by microbes as a food source to reproduce potentially causing problems in animal holobionts by causing pathogenic shifts or hypoxic conditions with excessive population numbers.

Here's some links by scientists studying reef ecosystems you might find informative:

"Coral Reefs in the Microbial Seas" This video compliments Rohwer's book of the same title (Paper back is ~$20, Kindle is ~$10), both deal with the conflicting roles of the different types of DOC in reef ecosystems. While there is overlap bewteen his book and the video both have information not covered by the other and together give a broader view of the complex relationships found in reef ecosystems


Changing Seas - Mysterious Microbes


Microbial view of Coral Decline


Nitrogen cycling in hte coral holobiont


BActeria and Sponges


Maintenance of Coral Reef Health (refferences at the end)


Optical Feedback Loop in Colorful Coral Bleaching


DNA Sequencing and the Reef Tank Microbiome



And if you want to dig into the research a little more here's a data bomb.

Global microbialization of coral reefs - DDAM Proven

Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae‐mediated, microbe‐induced coral mortality

Influence of coral and algal exudates on microbially mediated reef metabolism.
Coral DOC improves oxygen (autotrophy), algae DOC reduces oxygen (heterotrophy).

Role of elevated organic carbon levels and microbial activity in coral mortality

Effects of Coral Reef Benthic Primary Producers on Dissolved Organic Carbon and Microbial Activity
Algae releases significantly more DOC into the water than coral.

Pathologies and mortality rates caused by organic carbon and nutrient stressors in three Caribbean coral species.
DOC caused coral death but not high nitrates, phosphates or ammonium.

Visualization of oxygen distribution patterns caused by coral and algae

Biological oxygen demand optode analysis of coral reef-associated microbial communities exposed to algal exudates
Exposure to exudates derived from turf algae stimulated higher oxygen drawdown by the coral-associated bacteria.

Microbial ecology: Algae feed a shift on coral reefs

Coral and macroalgal exudates vary in neutral sugar composition and differentially enrich reef bacterioplankton lineages.

Sugar enrichment provides evidence for a role of nitrogen fixation in coral bleaching

Elevated ammonium delays the impairment of the coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis during labile carbon pollution
(here's an argument for maintaining heavy fish loads if you're carbon dosing)

Excess labile carbon promotes the expression of virulence factors in coral reef bacterioplankton

Unseen players shape benthic competition on coral reefs.

Allelochemicals Produced by Brown Macroalgae of the Lobophora Genus Are Active against Coral Larvae and Associated Bacteria, Supporting Pathogenic Shifts to Vibrio Dominance.

Macroalgae decrease growth and alter microbial community structure of the reef-building coral, Porites astreoides.

Macroalgal extracts induce bacterial assemblage shifts and sublethal tissue stress in Caribbean corals.

Biophysical and physiological processes causing oxygen loss from coral reefs.


Coral Reef Microorganisms in a Changing Climate, Fig 3

Ecosystem Microbiology of Coral Reefs: Linking Genomic, Metabolomic, and Biogeochemical Dynamics from Animal Symbioses to Reefscape Processes


Because sponges are essential players in the carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle(s) on reefs here's some links to research done with them.

Element cycling on tropical coral reefs.
This is Jasper de Geoij's ground breaking research on reef sponge finding some species process labile DOC 1000X faster than bacterioplankton. (The introduction is in Dutch but the content is in English.)

Sponge symbionts and the marine P cycle

Phosphorus sequestration in the form of polyphosphate by microbial symbionts in marine sponges

Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop.
Sponges treat DOC from algae differently than DOC from corals

A Vicious Circle? Altered Carbon and Nutrient Cycling May Explain the Low Resilience of Caribbean Coral Reefs

Surviving in a Marine Desert The Sponge Loop Retains Resources Within Coral Reefs
Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen are quickly processed by sponges and released back into the reef food web in hours as carbon and nitrogen rich detritus.

Natural Diet of Coral-Excavating Sponges Consists Mainly of Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC)

The Role of Marine Sponges in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles of COral Reefs and Nearshore Environments.

And since we're discussing favorable and not so favorable bacteria here's a paper looking at how different corals and polyps are influencing the bacteria in the water column.
Aura-biomes are present in the water layer above coral reef benthic macro-organisms

@Timfish excellent post! This would make a great sticky thread for future use…
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Timfish excellent post! This would make a great sticky thread for future use…

Thank you! The research on reefs and the roles of DOC and microbes in maintaining coral health is really fascintating. It is gratifying to see more and more aquarists aware of current research unfortunately some of the discussion on aquarists forums also highlights some of the dogma ingrained in reefs keeping. I'd love or see articles written by the researchers who are doing the research.
 
OP
OP
T

thejacgues

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
61
Reaction score
13
Location
Poland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you @Timfish, that's a bomb indeed...

Three very famous methods - Triton (macroalgae refugium) and Zeovit / Tropic Marin (carbon for bacteria) rely on things, which according to my superficial understanding of these studies, may increase the mortality of corals.
On the other hand, both of them are the most efficient nutrient export methods known in reef tanks.

I am aware that it is much more complex than that and possibly some macroalgae can release harmful DOC, meanwhile other might now. The same goes with carbon dosing - there are so many ingredients used for that purpose and each alters the microbiome differently.

The question is - relying on your knowledge and all the readings you have made, what would you suggest as a safer method? Going towards a refugium-based system or rather carbon dosing to stimulate bacteria populations?
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you @Timfish, that's a bomb indeed...

Three very famous methods - Triton (macroalgae refugium) and Zeovit / Tropic Marin (carbon for bacteria) rely on things, which according to my superficial understanding of these studies, may increase the mortality of corals.
On the other hand, both of them are the most efficient nutrient export methods known in reef tanks.

I am aware that it is much more complex than that and possibly some macroalgae can release harmful DOC, meanwhile other might now. The same goes with carbon dosing - there are so many ingredients used for that purpose and each alters the microbiome differently.

The question is - relying on your knowledge and all the readings you have made, what would you suggest as a safer method? Going towards a refugium-based system or rather carbon dosing to stimulate bacteria populations?

Well, why do you believe carbon dosing is the best way to remove nutrients? What research can you point to that shows those three methods (carbon dosing) actually are the most effecient methods? Certainly aquarists have dosed carbon and assumed it was beneficiual due to the better colors. But what is being overlooked (and an excellent example of one of the dogmas ingrained in the hobby) is the belief that brighter colors equates to healthy corals when in actuality flourescing and chromo proteins are made to deal with less than ideal environmental conditions or disease issues.

One obvious explanation why aquarists get away with carbon dosing is some of the cryptic sponges in out tanks can remove it 1000X faster than the bacterioplankton in our tanks and supposedly removed by skimmers. Unfortunately cryptic sponges have also been shown to prcess different types of DOC differently and we can't test for or identify chronic issues caused by these different shifts in microbiomes.

Considering it can take decades for some corals to reach sexual maturity and reproduce it seems to me keeping an animal a few years is like keeping a puppy or kitten a few months. In light of the environmental and legislative issues surrounding reefs and reef keeping I thhink we should be embracing current research on keeping corla healthy as long as possible in our systems and not striving for a tank of "eye candy".

What's seems to me is ignored is photosynthetic animals are pulling out nutrients. For example, looking at the distribution of PO4 most of the oceans are about .2 mg/l which drops at the surface and fluctuates with phytoplankton then drops even lower around reefs. AS far as various type of DOC work done subjecting corals to higher levels of their own DOC caused death due to the increase of microbes.

Since youe goal is to keep a tank full of anemones here's one of mine. There's three different clone lines, a brown that orriginates with a wild BAT purchased in '98, a teal w/ pink tips from a friends system I got in '07 or '08 and a rose from a freinds tank of '12 oe '13. FIltration is just an empty sump, no skimmer or reactors and dosing is baking soda added spradicly. Water chagnes are a bucket weekly. The system also has plate corals reprodcuing asexually (it takes a couple decades for one to become a mature female). Doing a water change and wipping the algae off the glass takes about 15 minutes weekly and there's about another 15 - 20 minutes monthly for other stuff (testing, removing mushrooms, siphoning sand occasionally, etc.). (Note the rose actually gets to full size.)

Big Red 20210819.jpg
 

Piscans

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2022
Messages
195
Reaction score
245
Location
somewhere
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i mean its possible, if you have a lot of stuff like mushroom and kenya tree & zoa with the anenomes, a nice full spectrum light that lets everything grow, and just like a pair of clowns, there really wont be much nutrient issues. you could do a water change every month or two. just to keep trace nutrients levels good. you can also feed the anenomes which is super benefical.
 

Lost in the Sauce

BANGERANG!!!!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
18,889
Reaction score
91,539
Location
Southern California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
To me personally, this sounds like a nightmare.

My anenome only system requires the most testing and dosing for alk and No3 of all 3 of my systems and shows very quickly when things are out of whack.

Also a little bit of carbon won't do it. For a full mixed species anemone tank, you're going to want a Lot of carbon, changed out frequently.
 
OP
OP
T

thejacgues

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
61
Reaction score
13
Location
Poland
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, why do you believe carbon dosing is the best way to remove nutrients? What research can you point to that shows those three methods (carbon dosing) actually are the most effecient methods?

I do not recall naming it the most efficient method, but it surely works quickly and provides the expected result.
When I was less experienced, I used to have NO3 spikes above 50 and seeing my corals dying, newbie carbon dosing did the trick and allowed me to decrease it within 2-3 days to acceptable levels (although powerful skimming and aeration are vital). I know doing things slowly is advised, but that was an emergency.

I am also referring to videos like this - and Fauna Marin's method, which allegedly prevents the growth of harmful bacteria.
I need to admit that with substances like sugar, I had multiple issues, but more sophisticated options like propylene glycol turned to seem to be much safer and better in a more balanced export of NO3 and most importantly PO4.

With carbon dosing, my feeding could be virtually unlimited (at a reasonable spectrum), as whenever I reach amounts like 3-4 frozen food cubes a day, an increase of carbon intake managed to maintain nutrients in low ranges.

I haven't conducted any experiments with controls and comparisons of various methods at the same time, so I am not questioning their effectiveness. All I know is carbon dosing is simple, cheap, effective and can yield extra bacterioplankton for corals or even according to Lou Ekus, can help in the transportation of PO4 from the water column to corals' tissue.

What I don't know though is a long-term perspective and results, which are less obvious (like the potential accumulation of harmful DOC) or other problems. What's promising is the fact, that well-though carbon along with bacteria dosing has proven to be effective in treating dino spread in reef tanks.
 

Timfish

Crusty Old Salt
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Austin, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
. . . On the other hand, both of them are the most efficient nutrient export methods known in reef tanks. . . .

I do not recall naming it the most efficient method, but it surely works quickly and provides the expected result. . . .

Sorry! That's how I read your comment.


. . . I haven't conducted any experiments with controls and comparisons of various methods at the same time, so I am not questioning their effectiveness. All I know is carbon dosing is simple, cheap, effective and can yield extra bacterioplankton for corals or even according to Lou Ekus, can help in the transportation of PO4 from the water column to corals' tissue.

What I don't know though is a long-term perspective and results, which are less obvious (like the potential accumulation of harmful DOC) or other problems. What's promising is the fact, that well-though carbon along with bacteria dosing has proven to be effective in treating dino spread in reef tanks.

Back in the 90's a popular weight loss product, Fen-Phen, worked wonders and had lots of adherents touting it's benefits, then people started dieing. I've seen some spectacular looking systems using labile DOC aka carbon dosing. But all the research shows it promotes unatural shifts in microbial populations either directly or in directly like what happens when sponges process it.

In refference to your origial question about not doing water changes, considering how little we know and maybe more importanlty how little we can test for the various kinds or types of DOC and associated shifts in animal microbiomes I don't see how reef systems and animals can be kept healthy without water changes.
 

Keeping it clean: Have you used a filter roller?

  • I currently use a filter roller.

    Votes: 53 31.5%
  • I don’t currently use a filter roller, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 6 3.6%
  • I have never used a filter roller, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 45 26.8%
  • I have never used a filter roller and have no plans to in the future.

    Votes: 56 33.3%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 4.8%
Back
Top