Are you suggesting that they have super bioengineered some kind of bacteria based chemical that appears to be the same one that's in Vibrant and Algaefix?I saw comments from UWC that 1) indicated the use of bacterial metabolites (i.e., cell free) from cyanobacteria and select Bacillus spp. that involve the production of polyaspartic acid; 2) suggested that the quat-like response is normal; and 3) that the lab who developed it is slated to present this research at an upcoming conference for the American Society of Microbiologists. I'm assuming it's a biotech firm and the 'bacteria blend' has remained a proprietary secret because they're working on a patent and/or publication. That's pretty normal. I've checked and the book of abstracts for that conference is not out yet but it seems plausible to me due to how easily it can be verified.
I don't somehow believe this, I am asking for clarity. If certain compounds are present at low enough concentrations and would normally have some peak overlap to begin with, could their signals have poor resolution compared to something like a QAC that's present in larger amounts? Also, it contains a QAC, are we sure it's polixetonium and not something like cholinium?
Thank you! I was asking for specifically this reason, not QACs.